skippy the bush kangaroo

Friday, April 30, 2004

cbs not awol with truth about chickenhawks

we never thought we'd see it in our lifetime, but a major news organ is actually reporting the truth.

dick meyer, on cbsnews, cuts right to the chase, asking what we've been asking for the last two weeks:

what kind of absurd political twilight zone is it where george bush and dick cheney can make john kerry look like an unpatriotic chicken by focusing attention on his combat duty in vietnam?
mr. meyer goes on to use the word that accurately describes these people who cry for war when they themselves have never seen any of it firsthand:

what is the word that has more gall than gall? nerve? cheek, chutzpah conceit, arrogance, condescension? you name it -- the squadron of chickenhawks that steers both the campaign and government of president bush's have pots of it. where do these people come off impugning john kerry's vietnam era guts and patriotism? john mccain, colin powell, tom ridge or chuck hagel might have some moral standing, but not these chickenhawks.

this whole chickenhawk issue has become sort of politically incorrect, in a republican sort of way. it's considered a rude charge. i don't buy that…

the list of bush supporter's in government, in the campaign and in the ideas industry who also had no military service at all, not just no combat, is also relevant: karen hughes, karl rove, condoleezza rice, richard perle, douglas feith, lewis libby, william kristol, paul wolfowitz, and tom delay. oh yeah, and dick cheney.
and, being fans of historic arcania, we admire his use of a quote from the 19th century:

allow me to add a stray point: these chickenhawks had a great influence in the decision to wage war on iraq. after the civil war, william tecumseh sherman noted, "it is only those who have neither fired a shot nor heard the shrieks and groans of the wounded who cry for blood, more vengeance. more desolation."

the most forceful advocates for war in the administration had seen the least of it.
nicely done, mr. meyer.
posted by skippy at 6:56 PM | 0 comments
ohio news network not awol with nightline tonight

luckily for parts of ohio, the ohio news network has agreed to air tonight's controversial nightline segment, in spite of the sinclair broadcasting group's decision to not show the program on its affiliates:

viewers in central ohio and across the state will get to see friday night's nightline program on onn…

the sinclair broadcast group, the owner of 8 abc affiliates nationwide, decided not run the program. that includes one station here in ohio…

friday, abc contacted the ohio news network and asked onn to air the program. onn decided to air the program and give viewers the choice.

viewers across ohio can watch nightline here on the ohio news network live friday night at 11:35 p.m. the show will last 40 minutes rather than the usual half hour.
on a more satirical note, the village voice has the draft of a memo that was found in the janitor's closet at sinclair broadcasting:

no organization holds our media industry and the executives who use it to line their pockets in higher regard than sinclair broadcast group. while sinclair would support a mendacious effort to cover up the alarming number of americans who have died in iraq, mr. koppel is using simple, indisputable facts—names and photos of the dead, no less—to dramatize the war and give viewers a chance to judge its consequences. however, an informed citizenry is anathema to the corporate state, and we suspect that many of those currently working toward this goal have financial connections to al qaeda. dick cheney informs us that we are not alone in this viewpoint. as a result, we have decided to preempt the broadcast of nightline this friday on each of our abc affiliates.

sinclair owns 62 stations in 39 markets, including eight abc affiliates. if that sounds like a monopoly, it is, and we got it the old-fashioned way—we shilled for it. in 2004, we gave 98 percent of our political donations, or $65,434, to gop causes. we applaud the gop's support for deregulation, and we intend to return the favor by cheerleading for the war. unlike the bad news bears at abc, we think of ourselves as the good news network. in case you haven't heard, 98 percent of iraqis are thrilled by the u.s. occupation. we have hundreds of hours of footage of people who were paid to say so.
on a related note, we at skippy international have decided not to run any reviews of books by upton sinclair unless he presents both sides of the meat packing industry.

addendum: freep this wear-tv online poll asking if you agree with the sinclair decision. (hint: it's a tricky question, worded for manipulation of results, so your answer would be i disagree with the decision.")
posted by skippy at 6:35 PM | 0 comments
proof positive that dumb people vote repubbblican

this piece on the american assembler has taken the ravens advanced progressive matrices of average iq by state and compared it to the 2000 election results by state.

see a pattern here?

(thanks to our bud jj at the daily cookie for this one).
posted by skippy at 5:07 PM | 0 comments
who wrote this stuff?

mrs. skippy likes the current aarp commercial which shows everyday ordinary americans trying to make sense of the new medicare rules.

skippy personally thinks it's a spot which unintentionally backfires on the aarp...after all, they're the organization which, against the protestations of several thousands of its members, sponsored the bill which made the program more complicated, and less beneficial to all but the insurance companies (which help sponsor aarp).

nonetheless, our bud jj at the daily cookie sends us a link which points out that in the ruckus to get the bill passed, awol may have violated federal law by withholding the exact amount the program would cost from congress. the nytimes:

the congressional research service says the bush administration apparently violated federal law by ordering the chief medicare actuary to withhold information from congress indicating that the new medicare law could cost far more than white house officials had said.

in a report on monday, the research service said that congress's "right to receive truthful information from federal agencies to assist in its legislative functions is clear and unassailable." since 1912, it said, federal laws have protected the rights of federal employees to communicate with congress, and recent laws have "reaffirmed and strengthened" those protections.

the actuary, richard s. foster, has testified that he was ordered to withhold the cost estimates last year, when congress was considering legislation to add a drug benefit to medicare. the order, he said, came from thomas a. scully, who was then the administrator of medicare.

mr. foster said mr. scully threatened to discipline him for insubordination if he gave congress the data.
only in this administration do people get punished for giving out information.
posted by skippy at 5:01 PM | 0 comments
gambling with the country's future

a daily kos diary directs us to casino fortune online presidential poll.

casino online promises to contribute $100,000 to the campaign of the the winner of the poll. so go vote for kerry.

as somebody who already beat us to the punchline said, are we sure it isn't just bill bennett playing with the virtual slots?
posted by skippy at 4:29 PM | 0 comments
happy anniversary, mission accomplished!

tomorrow will mark the one year anniversary since awol's impression of tom cruise, when he declared "mission accomplished" and an end to major combat operations in iraq.

awol is happy with the results of the coalition's efforts, as can be seen in his remarks at the 2004 victory celebration last week in coral gables. he said, in part:

we acted. we acted and there are no longer mass graves and torture rooms and rape rooms in iraq.
no mass graves? no torture rooms?

now, that doesn't mean that if you look up 'irony' in the dictionary, you see his picture. for that, you have to look up 'clueless.'

addendum: for the latest on mass graves statistics, keep watching the iraq body count database.
posted by skippy at 4:23 PM | 0 comments
don't listen to the left, give me a hummer instead

atrios is reporting that david d. smith, the ceo of sinclair broadcasting (which is refusing to run tonight's nightline episode of the names of all the u.s. troops who have died in iraq) was arrested in 1996 for "committing a perverted sex act in a company-owned mercedes" which we did not know was illegal (would a lincoln mercury have been all right?):

broadcasting official charged in sex stakeout
sinclair president, woman arrested in company car

published on: august 15, 1996
edition: final
section: news
page: 2b
byline: sun staffpeter hermann

372

the president of baltimore-based sinclair broadcast group inc., which owns the local fox television affiliate, was arrested tuesday night and charged with committing a perverted sex act in a company-owned mercedes, city police said.

david deniston smith, 45, of the 800 block of hillstead drive in timonium, who also is sinclair's chief executive, was arrested in an undercover sting at read and st. paul streets, a downtown corner frequented by prostitutes, baltimore police said yesterday.
atrios, unfortunately, does not provide a link.
posted by skippy at 4:06 PM | 0 comments
matthews hit on the head with his own hardball

thanks to the good doctor carol at the sideshow, we get the video clip of bill mahrer tearing chris matthews a new one.
posted by skippy at 11:39 AM | 0 comments
sinclair broadcasting still awol with nightline

some more info on the sinclair fiasco:

the progress report has the lowdown on sinclair's right-wing agenda, detailing all the other partisan manipulations of their affiliates as well as their refusal to air the nightline episode tonight.

and ralph's daily kos diary took us to senator john mccain's scathing letter to sinclair broadcasting, denouncing their decision:

there is no valid reason for sinclair to shirk its responsibility in what i assume is a very misguided attempt to prevent your viewers from completely appreciating the extraordinary sacrifices made on their behalf by americans serving in iraq. war is an awful, but sometimes necessary business. your decision to deny your viewers an opportunity to be reminded of war’s terrible costs, in all their heartbreaking detail, is a gross disservice to the public, and to the men and women of the united states armed forces. it is, in short, sir, unpatriotic. i hope it meets with the public opprobrium it most certainly deserves.
and some more email addresses to sinclair:

  • ceo david smith: dsmith@sbgnet.com
  • vp mark hyman: mhyman@sbgnet.com
posted by skippy at 11:37 AM | 0 comments
the ol' skippy mailbag

most of today's mail concerns the recent discovery that a few american soldiers were abusing iraqi prisoners.

ned, at digestible news, sends us links to the ukguard's story, and billmon's analysis.

jj at the daily cookie reminds us that the memory hole also has the pics.

on a somewhat lighter note, chuck currie sends us his latest interview with church leaders in the country who are not afraid to speak out against the madness that has overtaken the world: this time with the rev. william sloane coffin.
posted by skippy at 9:54 AM | 0 comments

Thursday, April 29, 2004

freedom of speech limits: you can't yell "dead american soldiers" in a crowded repubbb theater

in case you haven't heard, night line will be doing an amazing show tomorrow night. their program will consist entirely of the reading of names of the u.s. soldiers who have died in the iraq war.

in an email interview with al tompkins at poynter online, nightline exec. producer leroy sievers said:

i hope that viewers will remember that behind the numbers of casualties, that each of the men and women who have been killed was an individual, with a name, a face, a family, and a life. it is too easy to not go beyond the numbers. ted and i were embedded with the 3rd i.d. and we got to know many of the soldiers as individuals. it is too easy to see the helmet, the flak vest, and the uniform, and forget that these are all individuals?

there is no political statement intended. this broadcast is intended to honor those who have been killed, period. ted addressed the casket issue last friday on "nightline." i think that is a separate issue. at his recent press conference, president bush talked about how important it is to honor the sacrifice that these men and women have made. that's all we're trying to do.
too bad over a quarter of the country will not be allowed to see it. the sinclair broadcast group, which owns affiliates in 39 markets, is ordering its stations not to run friday's episode of nightline. bloomberg:

despite the denials by a spokeswoman for the show, the action appears to be motivated by a political agenda designed to undermine the efforts of the united states in iraq,'' the company said in a faxed statement. sinclair, which owns 62 u.s. television stations, said abc is disguising political statements as news content.
apparently, according to the blogging of the president, the execs at sinclair broadcasting are big donors to awol and the rnc. what a surprise.

here's a listing of sinclair's stations, with website links to them all. and atrios has phone numbers for the individual stations, in case you want to call them and let them know your outrage.

addendum: this daily kos diary has email addresses of the execs of sinclair broadcasting. be polite.

double addendeum: here's the email address of mark hyman, the vp of corporate and government relations at sinclair, who is the person that made the decision to drop the nightline episode. or you can call sinclair at 410-568-1500.

posted by skippy at 11:52 AM | 0 comments
fanmail from some flounders

madkane presents her latest, alpha politics.

jj at the daily cookie links us to this article which explains that minority groups are demanding an apology from pete coors for one of his spokespeople saying it would be worse to be compared to john kerry than to a kkk murderer.

(jj also sent us a link to a post by wonkette, but not only does wonkette refuse to link to us, blaming the policy on her boss, but we've already blogged about the grass roots political freeway signssimply ages ago).

motherlode of no more apples directs us to the veterans' alliance for security and democracy. motherlode actually spoke with the founder, col. klass, who was the head of veterans for dean.
posted by skippy at 10:26 AM | 0 comments
let's hear it for the 'roo

you may remember last year when we blogged about a real-life skippy: the kangaroo named lulu.

when her keeper was rendered unconscious while working on his farm, lulu hopped up to the farm house and alerted the farmer's wife by banging on the door. in essence, the kangaroo saved the man's life.

we are happy to report that lulu (who has her own website, so we are not the only bush kangaroo on the net) will receive the australian rspca national animal valor award. the bbc tell us:


leonard richards, 52, was hit by a falling branch, as he checked for storm damage on his property last september.

lulu, who was reared by the richards family, made a huge commotion to alert others, in a scene similar to the 1960s australian children's series skippy.

"it's the first time a native animal has ever received the award," said rspca executive officer jenny hodges.
as her website points out, lulu is the first and only kangaroo to win this award. and, not that many individuals of other species have won it, either, the bbc goes on to say:

lulu is only the ninth animal to receive the rspca's award honouring animals that display exceptional courage in the face of danger.

"what she did was really exceptional," said jenny hodges.

the story is reminiscent of the long-running skippy series, about a kangaroo that rescues people in distress in the australian bush.
we're always happy when we can google news the name of our blog, and actually get some hits!

good on ya, lulu!


(thanks and a tip of the bush kangaroo hat to reader bryan for the heads up to this story!)
posted by skippy at 12:17 AM | 0 comments

Wednesday, April 28, 2004

will they be tapping tap?

talkleft brings us the news that the government is considering monitoring blogs:

as a result, some analysts say u.s. intelligence and law enforcement officials might be starting to track blogs for important bits of information. this interest is a sign of how far web media such as blogs have come in reshaping the data-collection habits of intelligence professionals and others, even with the knowledge that the accuracy of what's reported in some blogs is questionable.

still, a panel of folks who work in the u.s. intelligence field - some of them spies or former spies - discussed this month at a conference in washington the idea of tracking blogs.
and in case the government is already watching our blog: go f*k yourself, awol!



posted by skippy at 11:57 PM | 0 comments
going down for america

we're not sure if this is parody or not, which, we suppose, is either the mark of a good parody or a sign of the apocalypse.

but thanks to a daily kos diary, we found operation take one for the country.com. and "taking one" means, quite bluntly, taking one between the legs (or some other orafice, if you want to let your imagination run wild).

we kid you not. the mission statement of otoftc:

about us: 'operation take one for the country' (abbreviated otoftc) is a movement of like-minded women (women predominantly as of right now) who have covertly organized into groups to frequent eating and drinking establishments near armed service bases where troops are preparing to ship out overseas, and take one for the country, so to speak. we are a virtual organization and have no official headquarters or charter. we believe us service men and women deserve our support and we are willing to make caring choices about making them happy.
brings a tear to your eye, doesn't it?

we are actually quite envious...when we were young and women hung out near bars where servicemen fratinized, they were called sluts, and not patriots. ah well, we are quite happy to see the younger generation prepared to give their all (or at least the best part of it) for their country.

kelly mcdonough, founder of otoftc, expounds her philosophy in this article:

"the men go off into harms way gratified, and because the organization is covert, they get the boost in ego thinking that they scored on their own attributes, they ship out relaxed and confident, with a distinct impression of a grateful nation behind them".
hey, skippy is grateful, too, but not that grateful! luckily, while the women are enthusiastic, they are not stupid:

mcdonough is adamant about safety "the principle is simple, don't do anyone you don't want to do, be safe, be protected" and reiterates this when meeting with toftc groups.

apparently there is no lack of volunteers for toftc outings. mcdonough relates her findings, "there is some much societal pressure on getting a job, getting married, you know, getting ahead. i think there are a lot of gals out there that want to do something for the country, they may or may not support some aspects of foreign policy, but they want to feel like they contribute or make a difference. and this is a fun way to do it, . . . so to speak".
so to speak. we appreciate her philosophy, that one can be against the war but still support our troops, if you know what we mean, wink wink, nudge nudge.

we especially like one idea found near the bottom of the webpage:

a great idea from shellie a., wife of lt. a of ft. rucker. she is calling on wives of servicemen to have 'felatio friday' at least once a month. awesome awesome idea.
gee, maybe bringing back the draft isn't such a bad idea. (and luckily for everyone you don't have to know how to spell it to do it.)
posted by skippy at 11:30 PM | 0 comments
say hello

to byron crawford.com: the mindset of a champion.

posted by skippy at 11:24 PM | 0 comments
the ol' skippy mailbag

letters, we get letters, we get stacks and stacks of letters...

judd legum, who writes cap's blog the progress report, lets us know that the center for american progress is compiling a data base of all the repubbb and rightists falsehoods, inconsistencies and downright lies compared to the actual facts of the matter (whatever matter is in question). and you can help! submit an entry here.

reader bayard brewin links us to redefeatbush.com, where they have a dynamite parody of the awol/cheney testimony at the 911 hearings today, as well as an analysis of cheney's "secret u.s. oil diplomacy."

and finally, our bud jj at the daily cookie directs us to bagnews notes, one of the more grahic (in the best sense of the word) blogs we've seen.
posted by skippy at 11:22 PM | 0 comments
polled down into the quagmire

a new cbs/nytimes poll has john kerry ahead of awol by 2%, unfortunately within the margin of error. however, even when ol' ralphie boy is factored into the equation, kerry still comes out ahead:

but voters view each candidate more negatively than positively, and when asked whom they?d support if the november election were held today (though it is still six months in the future) they divide almost evenly: kerry 46 percent, bush 44 percent. should ralph nader join the race, it becomes bush 43 percent, kerry 41 percent, and nader 5 percent.
more importantly, the percentage of voters who think the invasion of iraq was a good idea has dropped sharply:

for the first time, fewer than half of americans -- 47 percent -- now say that taking military action in iraq was the right thing to do. when the war began last spring, two-thirds believed it was the right thing to do, and 58 pecent still thought so as recently as last month.

was u.s. action right thing, or should u.s. have stayed out?

right thing:
  • now 47%
  • last month 58%
  • 3/2003 69%
stayed out:
  • now 46%
  • last month 37%
  • 3/2003 25%
the situation has moved iraq near the top of the list of issues that voters want the candidates to discuss: 21 percent now say it is the issue they most want to hear about from kerry and bush, up from 11 percent last month, and just behind the economy and jobs at 25 percent.

the belief that pre-war iraq required quick military action has also reached its lowest levels in this poll. just 32 percent now say that iraq had posed a threat requiring immediate action -- down from 58 percent who said this in april 2003. today, though only 17 percent believe iraq was never any threat at all, this sentiment has risen in recent weeks and is up from 8 percent one year ago.
posted by skippy at 5:20 PM | 0 comments
but didn't you say you were 'pro-life'? - a skippy rant

the washpost (via the bosglobe) asks a pertinent question (or more precisely, profiles an activist that asks that question):

if certain groups want the catholic church to refuse communion to a certain pro-choice senator/presidential candidate, shouldn't those same groups demand that the church to refuse it to pro-death penalty governors?

a question has been gnawing at frank mcneirney since he read that some roman catholic bishops want to deny communion to catholic politicians, such as the presumptive democratic presidential nominee john f. kerry, whose public positions are at odds with church doctrine.

"does this only apply to abortion?" asked mcneirney, 67, of bethesda, md. "what about the death penalty?"

after retiring as a trade magazine editor a dozen years ago, mcneirney founded a nonprofit organization, catholics against the death penalty, which has 1,200 members across the country. it's a mom-and-pop operation, run by mcneirney and his wife, ellen, out of their home. they are the first to acknowledge that it has nowhere near the political clout or public visibility of the nation's antiabortion groups.

but mcneirney is not alone in questioning whether the church's political vision has become myopic, focusing too narrowly on abortion.

some catholic publications, educators, and elected officials are also warning that church leaders may appear hypocritical or partisan if they condemn kerry because he favors abortion rights, but they say nothing about catholic governors who allow executions, catholic members of congress who support the iraq war, or catholic officials at all levels who ignore the church's teachings on social justice.
we at skippy international have often thought how inappropriate, and yet insidiously clever, the term "pro-life" was to define those of the self-righteous wing of politics who are against a woman's right to choose.

we have no quibble with someone if they choose to be pro-life. we think jesus was a real cool guy. and, though we think he dresses a bit flamboyantly for our tastes, we highly respect the pope.

but beyond those guys, we are hard pressed to think of someone who is actually pro-life.

because the majority of people who claim to be "pro-life," are actually labeling themselves with a much wider term than their beliefs warrant. and they do so knowingly, hoping to wrap themselves in a cloak of holiness that they don't actually live, let alone deserve.

we have no figures, but we'd bet anybody a dollar that the majority of pro-lifers actually are in favor of the death penalty, or war (specifically the one currently playing at a theater near fallujah) or the broad interpretation of the 2nd ammendment to include individual gun ownership rights. or a combination of the three.

(we won't even get into killing animals for food. we will grant them that "life" in the term "pro-life" refers exclusively to human life. get over it, porky.)

if you favor war, you are not pro-life. if you favor the individual use of guns, which are built specifically for killing, you are not pro-life. and by the very definition of this sentence, if you favor the use of the death penalty you are not pro-life.

now, before you call your senator and demand they stop advertising on our blog, please listen. we are not saying there is anything inherentaly wrong with holding these positions. most of skippy's staff are not true pacifists. and most of us see war as a necessary evil, when countries are invaded or threatened (which does not apply to the current fiasco, but that's another rant).

and you'd be surprise, skippy himself is not anti-death penalty.

but he does not call himself "pro-life" since he believes there are times when it's moral and right to take another human's life (especially if that human is a scum sucking low life who kills other people, a la ted bundy, hitler, etc. etc.). he will be so hypocritical to purport to be in favor of the sanctity of life, when there are indeed circumstances that death is the remedy.

and, as for the anti-choice proponents, that too, is a valid point of view to hold, even if we disagree with it. however, those who are against a woman's right to choose should correctly call themselves "pro-fetal life," unless they are the pope or jesus, because that more appropriately describes their values. and there's nothing wrong with those values.

case in point: here's a piece by john jakubczyk, esq. (sic), in the intellectual conservative which decries john kerry's stand as a catholic who favors a woman's right to choose as pure hypocrisy. however, for the purposes of this exercise, we have replaced the word "abortion" with the words "death penalty," and the word "babies" with "death row inmates."

in a recent column, kerry – the great pretender, i explained why as a catholic, john f. kerry, should not receive holy communion if he was going to continue to espouse a pro-death penalty position in his run for the presidency. it seemed that kerry was attempting to appeal to catholics by claiming the he was a “believing and practicing catholic” – his words, not mine…

does john kerry think that we are so ignorant not to understand that the key component of belief is agreement with the central tenets of the faith? john, check it out – respect for the dignity of every human being made in the image and likeness of god is a central tenet of catholicism, not to mention christianity and judaism. it goes back to the ten commandments. you remember those, john. you know the one that states “thou shalt not kill.” what part of that do you not understand? confused? well, the church is there to help you understand. it means you do not kill innocent people. people include death row inmates. death row inmates include unborn death row inmates. after all, john you are not going to tell me that these unborn death row inmates are not human beings. you aren’t that ignorant to say they are not human beings…
ok, our little experiment kind of breaks down with the "innocent death row inmates" and the "unborn death row inmates," but let's wrap it up with our denoument, and you'll get the point:

the point is that the church is ultimately concerned about our souls, including john kerry’s soul, whether he cares to know or not. in fact, as a member of the mystical body of christ, it is also my duty to be concerned about john kerry’s soul. but as much as i would like him to renounce his support of death penalty, i am not blind. he has embraced the death penalty culture and all that it means. from his early days to the present, he and his fellow senator from massachusetts, edward kennedy, have been the epitome of all that is wrong in the expression of catholic virtue in public life. as bad as his pro-death penalty, pro-homosexual politics have been, it is the scandal of bad example that calls for condemnation. how many people have justified their sins because of john kerry and ted kennedy? how many people have turned their backs on the “least of their brothers and sisters” because john kerry, ted kennedy, tom daschele, chris dodd, and others all said no to life? how many death row inmates have died and women scarred because of their very public support for the killing of these death row inmates?
we especially like the part about how it's mr. jakubczyk's duty to worry about someone else's soul. if there were an spiritual equivalent of busy body, he would be it (a "busy-soul"?)

we also got a hoot out the "pro-death penalty pro-homosexual politics" which our little experiment created.

but you get the idea. it's so easy to turn the so-called "pro-lifer" logic around simply by pointing out the hypocrisy of their premise.

don't claim to be pro-life if you aren't. and don't expect everyone else to follow your selective thinking either.

now, don't bother us. we are going to eat some chicken.

bonus action alert! email mr. jakubczyc and ask him why being pro-death penalty doesn't disqualify one in the eyes of god from being "pro-life."
posted by skippy at 4:18 PM | 0 comments
say hello

to no more apples and like sunday, where we found rate the comedy central's 100 greatest stand ups according to annoyance factor on am i annoying.com.
posted by skippy at 3:50 PM | 0 comments
by the book, buy the book

always ready to plug the literary attempts of our blogging buddies, we are proud to announce the publication of the first daily kos book ever.

it's actually more of a pamphlet made up of bumper sticker/post cards with goofy yet strangely appropos sayings about you-know-who.

go buy a copy.
posted by skippy at 9:36 AM | 0 comments
a stern warning for awol

reader and contributor rose sends us this commentary from the latimes talking about howard stern's new anti-bush slant by judy rosen:

these days, stern's broadcasts are divided between his usual schtick — interviews with strippers, off-color song parodies, jokes about celebrities — and rants against the president. stern will never be mistaken for a policy wonk, but tune in to his show and you'll hear him cogently attacking administration positions on an impressive range of issues: stem-cell research, abortion rights, gay marriage, media consolidation, the handling of iraq.

meanwhile, stern's revamped website looks more like mother jones magazine than maxim: it features articles about the administration's trade violations in myanmar and includes a link to the contributions page of the john kerry for president site. indeed, stern has become an ardent kerry advocate. "i call on all fans of the show to vote against bush," he said on a recent broadcast. "we're going to deliver the white house to john kerry."

some might dismiss this as bluster, but stern's words should send a shiver up karl rove's spine. stern has a record of successful election-year activism; political observers in new york and new jersey remember how his on-air endorsements delivered key votes to george pataki and christine todd whitman in past gubernatorial races.

what's more, although stern's approximately 8.5 million listeners are often dismissed as overgrown frat boys, they might more accurately be called swing voters. they are overwhelmingly white and male, many are well educated and well off, and they vote. and millions of them listen to stern's show in battleground states — pennsylvania, michigan, ohio, missouri, tennessee, florida — where the election will be decided.
and how's the new anti-awol stand doing for howard? ms. rosen informs us,

by all indications, stern's message is getting through. since the fcc crackdown, his ratings have been going up. for example, arbitron says he's now no. 1 in los angeles in the 25-to-54 age group, a spot he last occupied in 1995. and among entertainer websites, his was rated second (behind oprah's) in mid-april.
and if anyone knows about politics and media, it's ms. rosen, who is currently working on a book about benjamin franklin's glass harmonica.

cross-posted at the daily kos, and the american street.
posted by skippy at 9:29 AM | 0 comments

Tuesday, April 27, 2004

we read the lumberjack, and we're ok; we sleep all night and we work all day

we went to the lumberjack online, to see their take on the pictures of coffins of war dead, and found this sad statistic:

to date 122 u.s. soldiers have died in april, out of a total 723 u.s. casualties since the war began in march 2003.
and, the jack ends their piece with another, perhaps even sadder, fact:

president bush has yet to attend the funerals or ceremonies for any of u.s. soldiers killed during his presidential term.
posted by skippy at 10:09 PM | 0 comments
mission not quite accomplished

considering it's less than a week to the one year anniversary of awol's imitation of tom cruise when he announced "mission accomplished" in the invasion of iraq, the irony would be funny, were hundreds of people not being killed at this very moment.

the coalition forces have begun an offensive on the two different fronts that hold the bulk of the insurgent problems in that country. the bosglobe tells us how the fighting has increased:

u.s. warplanes and artillery attacked sunni insurgents holed up in a slum in a thunderous show of force that rocked fallujah tuesday, sending huge plumes of black smoke into the night sky. the assault came after american troops killed 64 gunmen near the southern city of najaf.

an american soldier was killed tuesday in baghdad, raising the u.s. death toll for april to 115 the same number lost during the invasion of iraq that toppled saddam hussein last year. up to 1,200 iraqis also have been killed this month.

the second straight night of battles in fallujah came as the extension of a fragile cease-fire ended in the turbulent city west of baghdad. marines have been preparing to begin patrols in the city later this week.
good thing it looks like the coalition is getting the upper hand, because it looks like we won't be getting any more troops from britain. the ukguard says

tony blair today appeared to rule out the immediate deployment of more british troops in iraq, despite recent reports suggesting that as many as 2,000 extra soldiers could be sent to fill gaps left by the withdrawal of spanish forces.

"the advice that we have now is that we have sufficient troops to do the job," mr blair, speaking at a joint news conference with the italian prime minister, silvio berlusconi, said.
and, in case you were thinking about changing your vacation to iraq plans to a nice stay in syria, think again: a fierce gun battle has erutped in downtown syria after assailants fired rpg's into the former un headquarters there.

good thing we brought stability to the area by removing saddam.
posted by skippy at 3:51 PM | 0 comments
more bloggers than you can shake a stick at

the lovely folkbum has put together a list of bloggers who contribute regularly to the dkos community. we have put that list on our sister blog skippy junior. please visit them all!
posted by skippy at 12:50 PM | 0 comments
the ol' skippy mailbag

kelley kramer points out how the current fighting in iraq is playing havoc with the rebuilding of that country.

and the daily cookie sends us a nytimes op-ed that talks about awol's reefer madness in the war against drugs.

greenboy at needlenose tells us why iraq isn't vietnam.

and the drunk report shows us awol's secret playbook.
posted by skippy at 8:55 AM | 0 comments
some of congress not awol on the merc problem

the asspress is reporting that a handful of dems in congress are beginning to worry about the mercenaries in iraq. it's good to know that blogtopai (y!wctp!) isn't the only place with some foresight:

thirteen democrats wrote defense secretary donald h. rumsfeld this month to argue that providing security in a hostile area is a classic mission for the military.

''it would be a dangerous precedent if the united states allowed the presence of private armies operating outside the control of a governmental authority and beholden only to those that pay them,'' wrote the democrats, including senate minority leader tom daschle of south dakota.

in iraq, they said, the private armies need proper screening and supervision, or they could increase iraqi resentment.
and, worse, nobody really knows to whom they answer:

many of the contracts were thrown together quickly as the u.s.-led coalition tried to establish its presence in iraq, leaving vague lines of authority, unclear responsibilities and muddled channels of communications with the u.s.-led coalition. as a result, experts say, rules governing the private personnel can vary depending on how their contracts are written.

it's unclear, for example, what would happen if a private contractor killed an iraqi child, said loren thompson, a defense analyst at the lexington institute in arlington, va.

according to a coalition provisional authority directive, non-iraqi private security contractors, working for the coalition or its partner countries, are not subject to iraqi law but that of their home states...

further complicating the situation, the coalition, contractors and iraqi leaders are still negotiating what authorities these armed civilians will operate under when the coalition turns over political control to the iraqis on june 30. a defense official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the rules are expected to be worked out next month.
well, that's a relief!
posted by skippy at 12:24 AM | 0 comments

Monday, April 26, 2004

if he only had a heart, or brain

we were browsing through political animal, by the blogger formerly known as calpundit (yes! we coined that phrase, too!) when we came upon an interesting theory proferred in the comments section on the post analyzing eric alterman's take on woodward's take on the administration.

everyone pretty much agrees that cheney is the real man in charge. but how many people are aware of a condition that affects up to 42% of bypass surgery patients, known as pumphead:

a study from duke university, published in the new england journal of medicine in february, 2001, confirms what many doctors have suspected, but have been reluctant to discuss with their patients: a substantial proportion of patients after coronary artery bypass surgery experience measurable impairment in their mental capabilities.
the article, on about.com, goes on:

in the duke study, 261 patients having bypass surgery were tested for their cognitive capacity (i.e. mental ability) at four different times: before surgery, six weeks, six months, and five years after bypass surgery. patients were deemed to have significant impairment if they had a 20% decrease in test scores.
this study had three major findings

* cognitive impairment does indeed occur after bypass surgery. this study should move the existence of this phenomenon from the realm of locker room speculation to the realm of fact.

* the incidence of cognitive impairment was greater than most doctors would have predicted. in this study, 42% of patients had at least a 20% drop in test scores after surgery.

* the impairment was not temporary, as many doctors have claimed (or at least hoped).

the decrease in cognitive capacity persisted for 5 years.
sound like any vice-president we know?
posted by skippy at 6:17 PM | 0 comments
the million pictures of the million woman march

thanks to talkleft, we are sent to infoshop which has lots of pics of yesterday's rally in dc, with current estimates of 1,150,000 in attendance.
posted by skippy at 5:52 PM | 0 comments
say hello to

the rational liberal (on syracuse.com, also home to movie boy, where we found the lord of the rings, slightly condensed).
posted by skippy at 5:43 PM | 0 comments
technorati for jesus?

seen on the sign in front of the brentwood presbyterian church:

this sunday's sermon: googling for god.
posted by skippy at 5:41 PM | 0 comments
roll back those union gains!

nathan newman talks about the walmrtization of america:

no, what makes wal-mart pernicious is that, where henry ford saw that paying his workers well meant that they could afford to buy the cars he made (and as importantly, buy other goods that drove growth and higher wages at other companies), wal-mart pays wages that leaves their own workers so poor that many of them can't afford even wal-mart's low prices or enough to take care of their families, period.
posted by skippy at 11:22 AM | 0 comments
rise in violence not awol in iraq

things are bad on all fronts in iraq. intense fighting has broken out in fallujah, and a supposed chemical factory has exploded in baghdad. casualties are reported in both instances. the asspress:

an explosion leveled part of a building as u.s. troops searched it for suspected ''chemical munitions'' on monday, an american general said. two soldiers were killed and five wounded, and a cheering mob of iraqis looted their wrecked humvees, taking away weapons, a helmet and a bandolier...

in fallujah, u.s. troops and insurgents battled around a mosque in fighting that killed one marine and eight militants. the area shook with heavy explosions a day after u.s. officials announced a fragile cease-fire in the besieged city was being extended.

the deaths of the two soldiers in baghdad and the marine in fallujah brought to 114 the number of u.s. troops killed in combat this month. during the two-month invasion that toppled saddam hussein a year ago, 115 americans were killed.
the fighting in fallujah comes just as the cease-fire truce had been extended for two days, apparently for naught.

and skippy reports that bloomberg reports that cnn reports that 10 marines have been wounded in the fallujah fire fight.

and things are getting bad in najaraf, where the militia is stockpiling weapons in mosques and other holy sites, a development the coalition "won't tolerate." bloomberg again:

a “dangerous situation'' is developing in the south-central iraqi city of najaf, where shiite muslim insurgents are allegedly stockpiling weapons in schools and mosques, u.s. spokesman dan senor said, citing a statement by l. paul bremer, top administrator in iraq.

the u.s.-led coalition “won't tolerate'' that action, senor, a spokesman for the u.s.-led coalition provisional authority in iraq, read from bremer's statement. bremer called the standoff in najaf, where anti-u.s. shiite cleric moqtada al- sadr is hiding in a mosque, “explosive.''

u.s. soldiers remain massed outside the city and say al-sadr must be held to account after an iraqi judge issued an arrest warrant for him because of allegations he was involved in the murder of a rival cleric last april. “i will not speculate on next steps,'' said senor at a briefing in iraqi baghdad.
in a sad milestone, the first u.s. coast guardsman to die in battle since viet name was killed in the sea attack on the oil terminals on the persian gulf last weekend.
posted by skippy at 10:55 AM | 0 comments

Sunday, April 25, 2004

and you wonder why we call it "usa toady"

a white guy wrote fabricated news stories at a major u.s. paper, but nobody every blamed affirmative action.

jack kelley, (not the other guy in maverick) was allowed to flourish as a liar at usa today because of "lax editing and newsroom leadership, lack of staff communication, a star system, a workplace climate of fear and inconsistent rules on using anonymous sources," according to the findings of an independent panel of editors at that paper.

the scandal has lead to two editors resigning, and most of america afraid to trust pie charts.
posted by skippy at 6:02 PM | 0 comments
un documento interesante de las noticias sobre la tela

thanks to a comment on a daily kos diary, we found the tiempo de guerras, or war times, a billingual website concentrating on iraqi conflict vis a vie the latino community in america. a sampling:

relatives of u.s. soldiers in iraq, families of people killed on sept. 11, middle east experts and u.s. senators are all saying that president bush's policies--and his credibility--are now in shambles.

the president's overall job approval rate has plummeted to 43 percent. and polls show that for the first time a majority in the u.s. disapprove of his policies in iraq.

the white house has been shaken first and foremost by an explosion of iraqi resistance. the new york times reports that washington is facing a massive insurgency that is "sweeping up thousands of people, shiite and sunni, in a loose coalition united by overwhelming anti-americanism."

posted by skippy at 5:44 PM | 0 comments
the hole truth

dedicated readers of blogtopia (y!wctp!) are following the travails of russ kick, editor of the memory hole, which recently has come under fire by some for mixing in pictures of the coffins of dead astronauts from the columbia space shuttle disaster with pictures of coffins of war dead from iraq.

the memory hole had earlier posted pictures of coffins received under the freedom of information act, and labeled them as coming from the conflict in iraq. a few days later, nasa announced that 71 of those pictures were really of the columbia astronauts' coffins.

drudge made a big deal of this, as if was some sort of scandal. and the same cabal bunch of news elites that failed to even realize these pictures existed, dismissed the memory hole's efforts because of their so-called "mistake."

as it turns out, the only mistake the hole made was to trust the government. (and we've all made that mistake before, haven't we?)

in a clarification, russ kick explains that he specificially asked for photos of the coffins of the military dead, excluding the astronauts, when we made his original foia request:

among the 361 dover casket photos are a minority of images showing coffins of the columbia astronauts. [read more.] i didn't realize this at the time that i posted them, mainly because when the air force asked for clarification during the process, i specifically told them that i wasn't requesting photos of the columbia astronauts, only military personnel killed overseas.

(not that i have anything against astronauts. one of the tricks for writing successful freedom of information act requests is to make your request as narrow as possible. i was afraid that including the astronauts in the request would give the air force another excuse not to release the photos.
we are waiting to see the numerous corrections in various papers which implied that mr. kick was guilty of shoddy journalism.
posted by skippy at 5:32 PM | 0 comments
a whole bunch of thousands of protesters gather in dc

a huge number of women rallied against several of awol's policies in our nation's capitol today. the exact number differs, depending on which news outlet you read.

knight-ridder says "hundreds" of thousands:

in what may have been one of the largest rallies in the history of the women's movement, hundreds of thousands of marchers streamed down washington's pennsylvania avenue sunday, chanting and waving signs supporting abortion rights.

there were no official estimates of the size of the crowd, but the rally was huge, with people filling the grassy lawn of the national mall from the washington monument to the capitol. organizers put attendance at one million people. washington and u.s. park police declined to estimate the size of the crowd.
but the asspress says only "tens" of thousands:

tens of thousands of women gathered for an abortion-rights rally sunday as sen. hillary rodham clinton told several hundred of them the issue is about women gaining full equality.

at a pre-rally breakfast, clinton said the bush administration is "filled with people" who view the landmark 1973 roe v. wade abortion ruling by the supreme court "the worst abomination of constitutional law??

by midmorning, tens of thousands of marches had already come to the mall, many carrying brightly colored signs. "it's your choice, not theirs," said one placard.
the nytimes goes biblical, saying a vast multitude:

a vast multitude of protesters marched here today in support of abortion rights and to highlight what organizers contend is the bush administration's erosion of reproductive liberties.

the march followed several legislative defeats for abortion rights advocates, who have been battling a congress and white house that are led by allies of the anti-abortion movement. organizers say that by filling the washington mall with a wide cross-section of demonstrators from across america and the world, they hope to send a powerful message to the administration and return the issue of abortion rights to the forefront of american politics as the presidential campaign heats up.
posted by skippy at 5:03 PM | 0 comments

Saturday, April 24, 2004

violence awol from imf protests

the washpost reports that today's protests against the international monetary fund were mostly peaceful in dc:

peaceful and festive, a crowd of about 1,000 marched past the offices of multinational corporations they hold responsible for exploiting the poor, chanting "shame, shame" along the way.

the demonstrations are a spring ritual tied to the meetings of the world bank and international monetary fund and, as always, the causes were varied. protesters came to shout against the u.s. occupation of iraq, sweatshop labor abroad, the policies of president bush and much else.
there were very few arrests:

police arrested one protester for allegedly shooting tacks at an officer with a slingshot and another for scratching cars with a key.

"there are always a few people in the crowd who cause a problem or two, but the majority of people who come to protest are not about that sort of thing," said police chief charles ramsey. "they just want to have their voices heard."

scores of police behind 5-foot-high steel barricades kept the crowd well away from the world bank and imf, where finance ministers were meeting, when the parade reached that area.
and, fun for all, including the kiddies:

greg pason of rochelle park, n.j., brought his 10-year-old son trevor to show him a good time and because he couldn't get a baby sitter. "we want to oppose the world bank and their loaning policies, speak up for immigrants' rights and indigenous peoples' rights -- all the things that are avoided in the international trade agreements," he said.
something every 10 year old loves.

interestingly enough, bloomberg puts the number of protesters much higher:

bechtel group inc., the world's largest construction and engineering company, was among the targets of thousands of protesters demonstrating during world bank and international monetary fund meetings in washington.
and the australian advertiser backs up bloomberg in terms of numbers, if not spelling: "thousands protest globilisation."

organisers estimated between 3000 and 3500 people marched, and the event was more peaceful than past anti-globalisation protests in washington.
they know who "organised" the "globalisation," but who did the spell check?
posted by skippy at 8:54 PM | 0 comments
women not awol in dc sunday

via talkleft, here's an itinerary for the million woman march planned in our nation's capitol tomorrow, including the rally round the white house and the stand up for choice concert (starring, among others, our friend caroline rhea, with whom we have worked. she is a gracious and funny lady, and we are proud she is donating her time, along with the hilarious wanda sykes and a host(ess) of others, to this worthy cause).
posted by skippy at 8:48 PM | 0 comments
violence not awol today in iraq

violence flared across iraq on saturday. among the news highlights:

2 us sailors killed in iraq boat attack says the asspress

suicide attackers detonated explosive-laden boats near oil facilities in the persian gulf on saturday, killing two u.s. navy sailors in a new tactic against iraq's vital oil industry. elsewhere, violence across iraq killed at least 33 iraqis and four american soldiers. it was the first such maritime attack against oil facilities since u.s. troops invaded iraqi more than a year ago.
actually, the number of american soldiers killed elsewhere was five, as the asspress reports in a later article:

volleys of rockets struck the capital's crowded shiite muslim neighborhood of sadr city on saturday, hitting a busy market, smashing into a home and killing at least seven iraqis. outside baghdad, insurgents rocketed a u.s. military base, killing five soldiers.

besides the deaths in the sadr city rocket strikes, at least 13 iraqis were reported killed in a bombing at tikrit, clashes between polish troops and shiite militiamen in karbala and u.s. raids overnight in sadr city.
reuters talks about a roadside bomb killing 14 on a bus going to baghdad:

a roadside bomb killed 14 iraqis traveling by bus to baghdad on saturday and 12 others were wounded, a doctor at a nearby hospital said.

witnesses said the bus was driving just ahead of a convoy of six u.s. military vehicles when the roadside bomb, a favorite guerrilla weapon against the occupying forces, exploded.
and nine iraqis were killed in rocket attacks on a shi'ite market in the capital city, says the bulgarian news network.

witnesses said at least two projectiles hit the chicken market in the ourfalli neighbourhood of sadr city. abdul-jabbar al-zubeidi, director of a nearby hospital, said several of the wounded were in critical condition. it was not immediately clear who had fired the weapons
and, no surprise to anyone, the number of u.s. troops wounded has increased sharply in the last two weeks, according to military.com.

thanks to lunaville's iraq coalition casualty page for the links.


posted by skippy at 8:41 PM | 0 comments
say hello

to tholos of athena.
posted by skippy at 7:11 PM | 0 comments
never mind

no mind directs us to his latest cartoon over at comics sherpa.
posted by skippy at 7:10 PM | 0 comments
the good news is, several editorials agree with you. the bad news is, you're fired

not everyone agrees with the pentagon's anger over tami silico's photos of flag-draped coffins.

the nytimes op/ed:

since 1991, the defense department has prohibited taking photographs of the coffins of members of the armed services while they are being transported back to the united states. the reverent portrait ms. silicio produced demonstrates how irrational that policy is. the theory seems to be that the pictures are intrusive, or possibly hurtful, to bereaved families. but it seems far more likely that the pentagon is concerned about the impact that photos of large numbers of flag-draped coffins may have on the american public's attitude toward the war.
joe soucheray in the pioneer press:

there certainly was nothing disrespectful about the photograph, and i can't for the life of me see how it might have breached any security concerns. dead is dead. these soldiers were going home, and silicio, who told a friend in seattle about the photos, said she wanted parents to know that "their children weren't being thrown around like a piece of cargo”…

as a result of silicio's photo getting published, and as a result of other similar photographs released under the freedom of information act, the bigwigs in the defense department went ballistic. they have now ordered that no more photographs like those be released. the bush administration insists that a ban on such photos reflects the wishes of families. sometimes the bush administration makes it difficult to remember the just cause here. that just cause takes lives. i'm not buying the idea that we are protecting the wishes of families.
the northern star on line:

the seattle times decided to run the photo, not silicio. she just took a picture that she thought would show relatives of soldiers killed that their loved ones are being returned with “care and devotion,” according to cnn.com. firing her was not the solution...

whether to run the coffin photo — or any photo — is the decision of the newspaper’s editors. the pentagon should not be involved. it is an ethical decision, not a government one…

if anything, this photo is more of a tribute to the soldiers and their families, not an insensitive action.

insensitive would describe the fallujah photos that displayed iraqis cheering as two burned and mutilated american bodies hung from a bridge. some may say that running these photos in a newspaper was not only insensitive but inhumane. silicio’s photo is neither of these.
the virginia pilot on line:

silicio’s photos and those from dover showed extraordinarily reverent scenes of the tender care given to america’s war dead. they illustrate the respect with which contractors, comrades and dover personnel treat our fallen soldiers.

by banning photos of flag-draped coffins and only allowing press coverage of individual graveside services, the bush administration seems to be stage-managing the consequences of its war of choice. but in a conflict that has called for almost no sacrifice from average citizens, the american people need to see that the war in iraq has human, as well as monetary, costs.
knight-ridder:

in 1999, army gen. hugh h. shelton, then chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, said in a speech that the united states should not commit troops to a foreign conflict if the war flunked "the dover test." "we have to ask the question, 'is the american public prepared for the sight of our most precious resources coming home in flag-draped caskets, into dover air force base?'"

rather than risk subjecting the war to the dover test, president george w. bush has enforced an out-of-sight, out-of-mind standard. in doing so, the administration manipulates americans' perceptions of the war, diminishes the gravity of the sacrifices of the dead and their families and denies our young men and women a last reverential salute from the country for which they died.
now, let's talk about letting the wounded back into our national consciousness.


cross-posted at mydd, and the daily kos, and the american street.
posted by skippy at 12:18 AM | 0 comments
turn about is fair play

sometimes it just takes an average american to speak the truth. from the letters section of the washpost:

the pentagon is upset because photos appeared of workers respectfully treating flag-draped coffins on their way from iraq and afghanistan back to their families in the united states ["photos of soldiers' coffins revive controversy," news story, april 23].

deputy undersecretary of defense john molino has said that such photos focus attention in ways that are "unwarranted and undignified." as a result of the pentagon outcry, tami silicio, the civilian contractor who took the photos, has lost her job, as has her husband, david landry.

i hope that mr. molino's job and others at the pentagon are not in jeopardy for their publicly opposing the president's policy on the use of photos of flag-draped coffins. president bush recently and proudly ran a television commercial for his reelection campaign using images of firefighters respectfully removing a flag-draped coffin from the wreckage of the world trade center, despite the outcry from some new york firefighters.

mr. bush reasoned that the sept. 11 attacks were part of our history and belong to the american people.
on the other hand, if some pentagon folks lose their jobs, perhaps ms. silicio and mr. landry will get theirs back.

peter w. rehwaldt
alameda, calif.
posted by skippy at 12:16 AM | 0 comments
tree huggers are generally non-bigots

thanks to dave neiwert at orcinus, we find out that the anti-immigration plank that tried to take over the board of the sierra club failed miserably. the asspress:

sierra club leaders beat back an effort by anti-immigration forces to gain control of the nation's largest and most influential environmental group.

in elections for the sierra club's 15-member board of directors, candidates picked by the leadership won all five open seats in a landslide, according to vote tallies released wednesday…

an increasingly vocal faction of the san francisco-based sierra club that advocates a tougher stance on immigration ran its own slate of candidates, calling u.s. population growth the greatest danger to the environment.
posted by skippy at 12:15 AM | 0 comments

Friday, April 23, 2004

we'd hate to see our annual review

yikes! skippy the bush kangaroo only got a "b" rating for content and appeal on the lefty review!

we're feeling worse than when mother skippy got the note from the teacher "does not play well with others."
posted by skippy at 10:06 PM | 0 comments
drudging up a stern look at ratings

thanks to atrios, we found out that drudge is reporting a huge upturn in howard stern's ratings since stern went "all-anti-awol all the time":

howard stern triumphs in new york city: back to #1 after indecency fight: arbitron ratings released this hour show badboy howard stern rocketing back to the top in new york city with a 7.2 share in 12+ listeners and a stunning 10.0 share in ages 25-54 [up from a 5.9 12+ in the fall]... stern, once again at the center of an indecency fight with the feds, takes nyc morning drive for the first three months of the year, over all-news wins [6.4 share], wabc's curtis & kuby [3.4 share] and wfan's don imus [2.6]...
slightly off topic addendum: also found, thanks to readers on atrios' comment section:

republicans for kerry yahoo group

republicans for kerry blog

republicans for kerry home page

republicans against bush

national republicans against bush meetup day

a list of awol staff who have resigned

and our personal favorite...

fun with hate radio
posted by skippy at 2:49 PM | 0 comments
the threat to awol: democracy

we got an email from moveon.org with some good news: the repubbbs are scared! it said, in part:

here's what bush/cheney '04 campaign director ken mehlman had to say about us on tuesday: "moveon.org is a huge threat and has hurt the president."

just a few years ago, no one would have believed that millions of real americans, working together, could have such an effect on the political landscape. but events like our bake sales last saturday have proved them wrong. in one sunny spring afternoon, over 1,000 bake sales from seattle to syracuse pulled in $750,000 -- mostly in $2 or $3 cookie-sized chunks. [ed. note: full report here.] moveon members are re-writing the political rule book, and, together, we're evening the playing field against the wealthiest presidential campaign in our country's history.
as always, the moveon email ends with a request for a donation...though we've had our issues with some of their tactics, the staff at skippy international heartily endorses a contribution to the moveon folks.
posted by skippy at 2:30 PM | 0 comments
things go better with cokie

we're as surprised as you are, but we agree with cokie roberts today, who, writing with husband steven, bemoans the loss of civility in congress:

if you want to know why the legislative process in washington is practically paralyzed, just look at what rep. pat toomey is trying to do in pennsylvania. the three-term republican lawmaker is challenging sen. arlen specter in a primary next week on grounds that the incumbent lacks pure conservative credentials.

"i represent the republican wing of the republican party," says toomey, stealing a line from howard dean, who boasted that he represented the "democratic wing" of his party. specter, adds the challenger, represents the "ted kennedy wing" of the gop.

we've known arlen specter since he came to the senate 24 years ago. he can be irascible, but he also represents a rare and valuable breed in washington. he believes that people in the opposing party sometimes have worthwhile things to say.
the roberts parse no words and call the mood in washington as they see it: jihad.

too often in today's washington, compromise is equated with betrayal. when political rivalry turns into a jihad, the system breaks down…

tom delay of texas, the majority leader and a devout jihadist, now runs the house of representatives. as a result, the mood on capitol hill is more hostile than we've seen during 40 years of covering politics.
and they point fingers:

the club for growth, a well-financed and rigidly conservative group, has spent about $1 million backing toomey, and its president, stephen moore, says other moderates should learn a lesson from specter's "near death" experience: if you're not pure, we'll come after you, too.

this is dangerous business. congress is coming to resemble a european parliament, with liberal and conservative parties divided along ideological lines and separated by a gulf of bad blood.
in the end, we have to sadly agree with the roberts' conclusion:

this is dangerous business. congress is coming to resemble a european parliament, with liberal and conservative parties divided along ideological lines and separated by a gulf of bad blood.




cross-posted at mydd, and the daily kos, and the american street.
posted by skippy at 10:51 AM | 0 comments
coming home

the release of those photos of the flag-draped coffins of the dead soldiers killed in iraq (by the seattle post intelligencer, and to a greater extent, by the memory hole) has stirred up a controversy and a half. the asspress reports that the pentagon is none too pleased.

photographs of flag-draped cases bearing american casualties from iraq should not have been made public under a pentagon policy prohibiting media coverage of human remains, officials said.

"quite frankly, we don't want the remains of our service members who have made the ultimate sacrifice to be the subject of any kind of attention that is unwarranted or undignified," said john molino, a deputy undersecretary of defense….

brig. gen. mark kimmitt in baghdad told abc's "good morning america" that u.s. military policy clearly states that the first persons who should be entitled to see their deceased loved ones should be family.

"i certainly know for myself that i would not want one of my loved ones to be a public spectacle before i'd had that first opportunity to grieve in person," he said.
amy goodman of democracy now discusses this issue with woody powell, exec. director of veterans for peace.

over at the moderate voice, joe gandelman has an extensive examination of both sides of the story.

and in sadder news about soldiers coming home, one young man apparently drowned his wife in the bath tub after returning from iraq (thanks to reader and contributor rose for sending us the link to that story).
posted by skippy at 9:12 AM | 0 comments

Thursday, April 22, 2004

happy earth day from the bush economic team

unemployment fell slightly last week, but still was higher than experts (read: guys with jobs) expected. cnnmoney:

initial claims for unemployment insurance dropped to 353,000 in the week ended april 17, down from a revised 362,000 the previous week, the u.s. labor department reported. economists expected 340,000 people to file for unemployment insurance, according to briefing.com.

the four-week average of initial claims, which irons out weekly fluctuations, rose to 347,000 last week from a revised 344,750 the prior week.

the labor department said the overall number of people on the benefit rolls who had already received an initial week of aid climbed to 3,019,000 from a revised 2,967,000 the previous week.
of course, there is good news, but only if you're making $250k or more.

rosy stock earnings news drove the dow jones all the way up to where it was 3 days ago.

and, as usual, repubbbs are claiming that climbing out of a hole is the same thing as traveling several miles.
posted by skippy at 9:38 PM | 0 comments
notes from all over

jillian at the daily cookie (rapidly becoming our biggest contributor, both in stories and extra calories) leads us to thetip.org which tells us that the awolcheney2000 campaign will pay $90,000 in civil fines for a failure to report " receipts and disbursements associated with its recount activities."

joe trippi, who obviously hasn't read our blog lately, or at least not last monday when we ragged on him for his bizarre law-firm conspiracy, sent us a nice email ("dear friend,") plugging both his website change for america and arianna huffington's new book fanatics and fools: the game plan for winning back america.

and finally, a shout out to scott at isebrand.com, who heard prof. nunberg mention our blog on the radio (click here to listen to him mention us!), and one to dean, who doesn't want to be seen maturbating (comment #5).
posted by skippy at 5:13 PM | 0 comments
down the memory hole

thanks to c2shiningc's daily kos diary, we find the much-hidden pictures of the coffins of our brave soldiers returning from iraq (the pictures awol doesn't want you to see!) over on the memory hole.
posted by skippy at 11:31 AM | 0 comments
happy earth day

here's our favorite blogs for all matters earth.

addendum: jj at cookies in heaven links us to the house democrats' earth day 2004 fact sheet.
posted by skippy at 9:11 AM | 0 comments
say hello

to loaded mouth.
posted by skippy at 9:07 AM | 0 comments
the ol' skippy mailbag

kelley kramer is reporting that the woman who took the recent picture of the soldiers' coffins arriving on the airplane has been fired from her job, as has her husband.

jj at cookies from heaven follows up on the paperless election machines with the oakland tribune article telling us diebold apologizes for failure.

talkleft compares the presidential candidates...from the bottom up.
posted by skippy at 9:06 AM | 0 comments

Wednesday, April 21, 2004

it's just an honor to be nominated

what a week! first, our humble blog gets mentioned alongside of the biggies (some of whom actually link to us) on dr. geoff nunberg's commentary during fresh air on npr, and now, we have been named blog of the day over at the moderate voice:

zippy skippy is judicious -- and delicious -- with words. many posts are short, consisting of quotes from various news stories. but when skippy jumps in with a comment every word counts -- and there's often a big idea expressed quickly. skippy is fun: at a quick glance you can read through some key story highlights, and also get a between-the-eyes liberal perspective on the news. it all may be in lower case but it's a big success. and for that we are proud to name skippy the bush kangaroo as our blog of the day......
[ed. note: our style sheet prevents us from capitalizing the words "its a big success" as in the original piece; but we did bold them, and added the apostrophe in the correct place, with all due respect].

and so the entire staff of skippy international says, thanks so much, joe gandelman, the veteran journalist who is now a full time ventriloquist. did you see our lips move?
posted by skippy at 5:04 PM | 0 comments
why the ketchup blog shouldn't have delinked kos

thanks to the smirking chimp, we find a major news outlet who finally describes (independently) the reasons kos didn't cry a patriotically-correct river over the deaths of those "contractors" in fallujah.

nicholas van hoffman in the new york observer: "privatization in iraq: contractors with guns"

the patriotic crap aside, if these men?s primary motives for being in iraq were flag and country, they?d still be in the armed services. at a pay grade of $350,000 a year, we know why they were there.

does that justify killing them? no, nothing can justify taking human life?but if you take one-third of a million dollars a year to walk around in somebody else?s country with a machine gun, and you get wasted by the locals, i don?t think you deserve a very big or elaborate funeral. they were there for the money, and these men?elite ex-soldiers that they were?knew the risks, and they took them. so be it...

what will be the reaction of the middle-aged reservists and national guard people serving for a few hundred dollars a month, at the risk of job and mortgage, when they find out about the thousands of mercenaries being paid a king?s ransom to do for money what they do for country? if there is a morale problem now, as these stories about suicides among our service people suggest, what, pray tell, will be the state of morale then?

what will be the morale of the members of congress who worry about where the money is coming from when it gets through to them that the united states is fighting this war with $1,000-a-day soldiers? ?

not only does privatization not save money waging war, it creates problem after problem, only some of which are visible at this juncture. if captured, are these mercenaries prisoners of war and subject to the geneva convention, or can they licitly be shot as spies and saboteurs? ?

apparently, there are a number of companies who hire these people, so the question arises about how much control the american authorities have over the irregulars running about the country. dyncorp mercenaries in the former yugoslavia were accused of rape and robbery. the point is that they are not subject to military discipline...



cross-posted at mydd, and the american street, and the daily kos.
posted by skippy at 4:51 PM | 0 comments
anticipation

we know, we are committing lefty hari-kari by saying it outloud, but we were thinking last night how sorry we were that john edwards didn't get to be the dem nominee (assuming really weird crap doesn't happen and kerry gets it this summer).

sorry, deaniacs, and we do acknowledge people-powered howard's effect on the dem message. but golly, no sooner had the vermont governor pulled the party back to its roots, then mr. ketchup goes completely out of his way to sound like bush lite.

left is right sums up our feelings on the matter:

i think another reason for kerry's soft appeal is that he is so much like bush. why bother stopping and getting out of your lincoln navigator and making the effort to get into your cadillac escalade, when either will get you to your destination? …

the more kerry tries to appeal to bush's base, the more he appears like bush. this risky strategy is probably going to backfire big time for kerry. it's already alienated true democratic progressives like me.
granted, mr. ketchup has to appeal to the middle of america. but we don't believe the middle of america is to the right of alan colmes, who is already to the right of any lefty.

we believe there is a huge amount of people out there who think the war in iraq is a disaster, and our boys and girls should not be over there. and we believe they think this administration lied to us about the reasons to go to war. why isn't mr. ketchup pounding this over and over?

well, we have our own bones to pick with the ketchup campaign. aside from the illogical snubbing of the daily kos by the john kerry blog, we now find out that the blog ran a "whoever gets the most contributions wins a ticket to the convention" rally, and completely failed to take into account eschaton's results.

ok, ok, we know we're being so petty, that if you call us tom and smash our hand against a wall, we could lead the heartbreakers. and we know that sen. ketchup himself had little or nothing to do with the terrible snubs of our favorites in blogtopia (y!wctp!). but he did hire the guy that hired the guy that hired the guy to run the blog. if he's not going to take responsibility now for the folks under him, he's looking more like awol everyday.

so he is supposedly "electable." we are of the opinion that john edwards was just as electable. and he was more exciting. in fact, if we may steal, sorry, we mean, paraphrase, a line from jon stewart, kerry makes al gore look like roberto benigni.

yes, we know, this is traitorous talk. so delink from us (the blogtopia version of "so sue us!"). we can't get excited about a man who parrots the guy he's trying to defeat, while at the same time dumping badly on the grass roots that are working hard to get him elected.
posted by skippy at 3:31 PM | 0 comments
blogging around

the road to surfdom finds a new blogging tool, which lets a blogger save a linked article from the web on their own personal archive (warning! tim rightly wonders about copyright issues).

undelay dabbles in irony.

the sideshow likes air america.

liberal oasis discusses the supposed rise in polls for awol.

oliver willis finds an ex-reaganite that proposes we all should vote democratic.

we don't care what you say. scrappleface may be on the other side, but he's funny!

yes, we admit, so is tom burka.

jane wraps up the week in iraq on classless warfare.

needlenose adds a couple more disasters.
posted by skippy at 12:27 PM | 0 comments
the coalition of the no-longer-so-willing

following spain's lead, some other nations are pulling their troops out of iraq.

the voa says honduras will.

the latimes says the dominican republic will and thailand might.

reuters says poland is considering it.

the scotsman reports the british house of commons is debating england's position.

the asspress says colin powell expects more nations to follow suit.
posted by skippy at 10:28 AM | 0 comments
say hello

to the target demographic.
posted by skippy at 9:15 AM | 0 comments
more fun with google

right here.
posted by skippy at 12:26 AM | 0 comments
violence not awol in southern iraq

3 coordinated car bombs exploded at police stations in basra, killing at least 40, says reuters:

the reuters correspondent said he had counted 40 bodies at one basra hospital. among the dead were many children who had been going to kindergarten in a minibus that was caught in one blast. many other civilians and police were killed or wounded.

"there were three separate explosions at police stations at about 7.15 a.m. (11:15 p.m. edt tuesday)," said a british military spokesman, squadron leader john arnold. "they were vehicle-based improvised explosive devices."

he said heavy casualties were feared, but he had no exact figures, partly because emergency vehicles and british troops who control basra could not reach two of the police stations.

"they are being stoned," arnold said, adding that no casualties among british forces had been reported.
update:reuters now tells us 68 people died in four suicide attacks:

suicide bombers killed 68 people, some of them children, in strikes on iraqi police stations in british-patrolled basra wednesday, shattering months of relative calm in the mainly shi'ite city.

basra mayor wael abdul-hafeez accused osama bin laden's al qaeda network of being behind the morning rush-hour blasts.

near-simultaneous vehicle explosions hit three police stations in basra and a police academy in zubair, a mainly sunni town 16 miles to the south.

"all four attacks seem to have been carried out by suicide bombers," said a british defense ministry spokeswoman in basra.

the mayor told a news conference 68 people, not counting the bombers, were killed and 99 wounded. among the dead were school children incinerated in a minibus caught by one blast.
posted by skippy at 12:25 AM | 0 comments

Tuesday, April 20, 2004

say hello

to logjam.
posted by skippy at 9:05 PM | 0 comments
the rich get csm, and poor get money magazine

nothing perplexes more than headlines from different magazines about essentially the same subject.

the christian science monitor reports that the economy is hot:

the us economy is cruising into spring with so much momentum that economists believe this is likely to be the best economic performance during the tenure of either president bush. in fact, the economy is now so strong that unless it weakens significantly later this year, it could turn out to be as good as the clinton boom years.
oh yeah? tell that to the consumers, who read money magazine, as reuters points out:

abc news and money magazine said their weekly consumer comfort index fell to -17 in the week ended april 18 from a reading of -14 the previous week. the index stands eight points below its 18-year average.

positive readings on the index's buying climate gauge, which measures how conducive the economy is to making purchases, fell hardest, to 36 percent from 39 percent.
to be fair to the csm, their story does go on to talk about the disconnect:

but this good news has an unusual twist: corporate america has been the greatest beneficiary so far, and the titans of industry are being very tight with their money. so job growth is expected to remain modest.

this presents the federal reserve with a dilemma: should it keep interest rates low until there are unequivocal signs that the job market is blooming, or should it start raising rates to fight off early signs of inflation? "this will be the next big test for the economy - how it adjusts to higher interest rates," says economist mark zandi of economy.com.
as you may or may not know, mr. andrea mitchell intimated that interest rates will be raised, and you know what that does to the stock market.
posted by skippy at 5:02 PM | 0 comments
polls not awol on skippy

a big thank you to all those who voted on our last poll "what's your opinion of air america radio?"

the biggest block of votes (29) went to "all in all, aar is just what we need." but the biggest split came, to nobody's surprise, on the question of our personal fave, randi rhodes. people voted 14-10 that she is brilliant as opposed to shrill. and, we smirk to ourselves, 5 people wanted to know, "hey, i thought aar was supposed to be funny!"

but now it's time for a new poll (bottom of our right hand sidebar, under our archives, you can't miss it). this week's question is, what's the most damaging thing about awol to come out recently?"

remember to vote early and often!
posted by skippy at 4:11 PM | 0 comments
paper trail? we don't need no steenkin' paper trail!

our blog buddy jj at cookies in heaven (the best cookies mrs. skippy ever tasted!) sends us a link to the oakland tribune's piece about the fact that diebold knew of the legal risks when it used software that violated state law.

attorneys for diebold election systems inc. warned in late november that its use of uncertified vote-counting software in alameda county violated california election law and broke its $12.7 million contract with alameda county.

soon after, a review of internal legal memos obtained by the oakland tribune shows diebold's attorneys at the los angeles office of jones day realized the mckinney, texas-based firm also faced a threat of criminal charges and exile from california elections.

yet despite warnings from the state's chief elections officer, diebold continued fielding poorly tested, faulty software and hardware in at least two of california's largest urban counties during the super tuesday primary, when e-voting temporarily broke down and voters were turned away at the polls.
posted by skippy at 11:20 AM | 0 comments
the comics ain't funny today

in a cost saving effort, the skippy's have chosen to not renew their daily newspaper, and get their info from the internet.

thus we are a bit behind in this news from comictopia (no, we're not taking credit for that phrase!). apparently the character bd in doonesbury and get fuzzy's cousin have both lost limbs in the iraq battle.

this is not our idea of funny.

but it is timely, and if the comics page is one of the few places in journalism that talks about our soldiers who are seriously maimed and wounded in the iraqi theater, than all the more reason to read them.

thanks to pisher's daily kos diary for the heads up.
posted by skippy at 11:11 AM | 0 comments
say hello

to dump bush in 2004! and pudentilla's perspective.
posted by skippy at 10:50 AM | 0 comments
what's your hurry here's your turban

the king of jordan ended his trip to the us early, going back home without ever seeing awol. we should all be so lucky.

in a move obviously calculated to convey displeasure over the u.s.'s new position on israel, king abdullah cut his visit short, one day before his scheduled meeting with awol. reuters:


when the king of jordan postponed this week's meeting with president bush, the snub revealed only a fraction of the humiliation felt by washington's arab friends.

constrained by protocol and unwilling to burn bridges with the most powerful country in the world, arab leaders like king abdullah can only hint at the dismay they felt when bush changed u.s. policy last week, diplomats and analysts say.

the blow was particularly hard for egyptian president hosni mubarak, who met bush on april 12 and was still in the united states two days later when bush gave two key and sensitive concessions to visiting israeli prime minister ariel sharon...

bush, apparently to help sharon win domestic support for his gaza withdrawal plan, said that israel could keep some west bank land and that palestinian refugees should not expect to reclaim their homes in what is now israel.

coupled with the u.s. occupation of iraq, which arabs increasingly associate with israel's occupation of palestinian territories, the concessions were political dynamite…

mubarak told the houston chronicle last week he was shocked by bush's promises to sharon. he told the french newspaper le monde this week the americans had never before been so detested in the arab world.
smooth move, exlax! er, we mean, awol!
posted by skippy at 9:43 AM | 0 comments

Monday, April 19, 2004

freep cnn

lower right hand side bar, a poll: will woodward's book hurt awol?

you know how to vote!
posted by skippy at 11:58 AM | 0 comments
say hello

to undelay and the moderate voice and lickin bush in '04.
posted by skippy at 11:54 AM | 0 comments
blogging killed the radio star

be sure to listen to dr. geoff nunberg's commentary about blogging today on fresh air on npr, when our humble efforts will be mentioned, along with some others, most of whom link to us.
posted by skippy at 12:21 AM | 0 comments
dites bonjour

au phersu.
posted by skippy at 12:21 AM | 0 comments
but that means karen hughes was deep throat

bob woodward's newest book "plan of attack" details how awol was making those plans as early as 2001 to invade iraq. cbsnews tells us

the white house confirms a passage in the book about a meeting in november 2001 between president bush and defense secretary donald rumsfeld that put the planning in motion, but says that did not mean mr. bush was set on a course of attacking iraq at that point...

woodward's account indicates some members of the administration, particularly vice president cheney, were focused on saddam hussein from the outset of mr. bush's presidency and even after the terrorist attacks made the destruction of al qaeda the top priority…

the book says mr. bush quietly ordered creation of a war plan against iraq in the meeting with rumsfeld while overseeing a divided national security team, including a vice president determined to link saddam to al qaeda.
woodward (the one not played by dustin hoffman) said on an interview with 60 minutes:

“and there's this low boil on iraq until the day before thanksgiving, nov. 21, 2001. this is 72 days after 9/11. this is part of this secret history. president bush, after a national security council meeting, takes don rumsfeld aside, collars him physically, and takes him into a little cubbyhole room and closes the door and says, ‘what have you got in terms of plans for iraq? what is the status of the war plan? i want you to get on it. i want you to keep it secret"…

“gets to a point where in july, the end of july 2002, they need $700 million, a large amount of money for all these tasks. and the president approves it. but congress doesn't know and it is done. they get the money from a supplemental appropriation for the afghan war, which congress has approved. …some people are gonna look at a document called the constitution which says that no money will be drawn from the treasury unless appropriated by congress. congress was totally in the dark on this."
oh yeah, we really needed to impeach clinton because of a hummer.
posted by skippy at 12:21 AM | 0 comments
what about mary kate and ashley olsen?

joe trippi, the man who made howard dean what he is today (a footnote in history), writes in change for america about air america's recent troubles being pulled off the air by multicultural radio broadcasting inc:

multicultural's claims were suspicious from the start. the owner, arthur liu, was quoted as saying that air america bounced some checks, but according to air america, everything was paid on time.

multicultural not only pulled air america off the radio -- they changed the locks on the station office.
it turns out there's more to multicultural than meets the eye. the ceo arthur liu, a republican supporter, retained the firm of gibson, dunn & crutcher -- a firm that lists ken starr and ted olsen as its alumni.

this is a right-wing blackout, and we can't let it happen. ken starr tried to overturn the results of one presidential election with whitewater; ted olsen successfully overturned another when he represented bush and cheney in bush v. gore in 2000. their cronies are trying to silence our voices.
uh, hol' on thar, baba louie. as much as we agree that arthur liu had an agenda, that agenda is probably found more in a joel grey soundtrack than the ex-employee list of one of the world's biggest law firms.

we think that liu's recent campaign contributions (bush, lazio, the rnc, etc), expertly detailed by blah3, do more to inform his reasons for pulling aa of the air.

but to use a tenuous link of ted olsen and ken starr through gd&c to point out liu's insidiousness is, we're sorry to come down on the side of reason and reality, stretching it beyond breaking.

sorry, joe, but skippy used to work at gibson, dunn and crutcher...that's right. skippy was a night shift word processor in the 90's at the los angele branch of that law firm. it is, after all, a huge multi-branched international company, and it employees thousands of people throughout the world.

while skippy was there, he was pleased to see that the firm encouraged pro bono work on a large scale. gd&c are indeed lawyers, so take that for what it's worth (think of the set up* to the punchline "a good start"), but for a law firm, they are an honorable and decent lot.

any organization that is huge will have a variety of people involved, and you can't label everybody based on the actions of one or two. for instance, joe lieberman is a democrat. go figure.

but saying that liu's motives are suspect because he uses one of over 800 lawyers from a firm where starr and olsen used to work, is a bit like saying that liu is underhanded because he buys gas from the same company that cheney does. (you speak english? ted bundy spoke english! what a coinky-dink!)

let's use the tin foil to heat our tv dinners, and not as head gear.

(thanks and a tip of the bush kangaroo hat [not tin foil] to the smirking chimp for the link to joe's amusing logic).


* what do you call 1000 lawyers at the bottom of the ocean?
posted by skippy at 12:20 AM | 0 comments

Sunday, April 18, 2004

gone fishin'

what have we been saying? fred kaplan on slate recaps george tenent's testimony to the 911 commission, which only reiterates what this space has been harping on for two and a half years: awol was on vacation for a month before 9/11.

the revelation came this morning, when cia director george tenet was on the stand. timothy roemer, a former democratic congressman, asked him when he first found out about the report from the fbi's minnesota field office that zacarias moussaoui, an islamic jihadist, had been taking lessons on how to fly a 747. tenet replied that he was briefed about the case on aug. 23 or 24, 2001.

roemer then asked tenet if he mentioned moussaoui to president bush at one of their frequent morning briefings. tenet replied, "i was not in briefings at this time." bush, he noted, "was on vacation." he added that he didn't see the president at all in august 2001. during the entire month, bush was at his ranch in texas. "you never talked with him?" roemer asked. "no," tenet replied. by the way, for much of august, tenet too was, as he put it, "on leave."

and there you have it. national security adviser condoleezza rice has made a big point of the fact that tenet briefed the president nearly every day. yet at the peak moment of threat, the two didn't talk at all. at a time when action was needed, and orders for action had to come from the top, the man at the top was resting undisturbed.
thanks a tip of the bush kangaroo hat to cursor for the link! cursor: it's what's for dinner.
posted by skippy at 1:46 PM | 0 comments
say hello

to eccentricity.
posted by skippy at 1:34 PM | 0 comments
spanish fly

away, that is. the new government of spain has ordered the withdrawl of all their troops from iraq "as soon as possible." the washpost:

jose luis rodriguez zapatero, whose socialist party scored a surprising win in the march 14 elections, announced the pullout order in a televised speech hours after his new government was sworn in.

the new prime minister said he had directed his defense minister, jose bono, "to do what is necessary for the spanish troops in iraq to come home in the shortest time and in the greatest safety possible”…

"with the information we have, and which we have gathered over the past few weeks, it is not likely that the united nations will adopt a resolution that will meet the conditions we have set for our presence in iraq," zapatero said, referring to spanish requirements for political and military change in iraq that would allow the spanish troops to remain.

but zapatero said his government would support u.n. or european union efforts to help iraq prepare for elections and the assumption of sovereignty. he is sending his foreign minister, miguel angel moratinos, to washington for meetings wednesday with secretary of state colin l. powell and national security adviser condoleezza rice to offer nonmilitary cooperation in iraq, such as training iraqi police.
meanwhile, knight ridder reports that u.s. military deaths have reached the highest number since the viet nam war:

the first part of april has been the bloodiest period so far for u.s. troops in iraq. there were 87 deaths by hostile fire in the first 15 days of the month, more than in the opening two weeks of the invasion, when 82 americans were killed in action.

"this has been some pretty intense fighting,'' said david segal, director of the university of maryland's center for research on military organization. "we're looking at what happened during the major battles of vietnam.''

the last time u.s. troops experienced a comparable two-week loss in combat was october 1971, two years before u.s. ground involvement ended in vietnam.
the number of u.s. deaths in iraq has now reached one less than 700 as of this writing.
posted by skippy at 12:53 PM | 0 comments

Saturday, April 17, 2004

top repubbb wants 911 commission to delay partisan comments

tom delay is upset that the 911 commission is actually questions that are hard. the asspress tells us

house majority leader tom delay urged the chairman of the sept. 11 commission yesterday to tone down "partisan mudslinging" by the panel's members, saying it could undermine the credibility of their final report.

in a letter to thomas kean, delay said he was troubled by what he believed was "gotcha-style questioning" during the panel's recent hearings featuring testimony by national security adviser condoleezza rice and top officials from the fbi and cia.

"the camera-driven tone of the hearings undermines the commission's credibility, distracts the american people from the gravity of the war on terror, and could send dangerous messages to unfriendly eyes and ears around the world," delay wrote.
or, to paraphrase awol, dissent is treason.

luckily, the commission isn't backing down:

"sometimes the public exchanges are pointed, but no more so than in the congress itself," kean responded in a letter to delay. "our answer to our critics can only be the quality of our report."
mr. kean also defended jamie gorelick, whom delay demanded resign from the commission, because it was her memo written as deputy att.gen. under clinton that created the "wall" which scared john ashcroft so much, he forgot to include "terrorism" in his budget for 2001.

kean said he did not think gorelick should resign because she had recused herself from parts of the probe covering her time in office.

gorelick told cnn this week: "all of the commission members have some government experience. everyone is subject to the same recusal policies. you could have had a commission with nobody who knew anything about government. and i don't think it would have been a very helpful commission."
also, in that cnn interview, ms. gorelick reveals that the dittoheads who can't bear to hold ashcroft, awol and condoleezza gibbons remotely responsible for anything, are cowardly enough to threaten the former deputy att.gen. with death:

jamie gorelick, a member of the commission investigating the terrorist attacks of september 11, 2001, said saturday that she received death threats this week after a number of conservatives alleged that her former work in the justice department may have contributed to failures leading to the attacks…

"i can confirm that i've received threats at my office and my home," she told cnn on saturday. "i did get a bomb threat to my home."

she added, "i have gotten a lot of very vile e-mails. the bomb threat was by phone”…

the threats were "scary," she said, but added that she was "not intimidated enough to resign from the commission."

a law enforcement source told cnn that the fbi is investigating the threats.
what was that about promoting violence from the left, mickey?
posted by skippy at 7:24 PM | 0 comments
the nytimes links to someone who doesn't link to us

found via instapundit (who does link to us, and is gracious about it, to boot), the nytimes does a feature on wonkette.
posted by skippy at 7:03 PM | 0 comments
we'd like a helping of tbogg with a side of south knox bubba, please

we'd like to direct everyone's attention to geoffrey nunberg's treatsie, which apparently was a commentary broadcast on "fresh air," april 19th, 2004 (two days from now. yes, we are proud to be the first time-traveling blog in history).

dr. nunberg talks about blogging in the global lunchroom. he takes an informal deconstructive approach (if there is such a thing, and if there isn't, we just coined that phrase, too) to exactly what a blog is, how it is written, and how blogs interact with each other.

(one small quibble. dr. nunberg still incorrectly calls it the "blogosphere," when we all know what it's called and who coined the phrase).

he points out that blogs created and written by journalists on newspaper staffs are, usually, not blogs at all, but newspaper staff diaries written as if they were published in newspapers.

blogging, he decides, is informal, "less like a public meeting than the lunchtime chatter in a high-school cafeteria..." he determines that blogging even tends towards the snarky, and a conversation in which the reader is treated as a co-conspirator, in on the joke:

bloggers didn't invent the word snarky, but they've had a lot to do with turning it into the metrosexual equivalent of bitchy. on the web, blogs account for more than three times as large a share of the total occurrences of snarky as of the occurrences of irony.
at this point, there's a footnote showing dr. nunberg's research and his figures to prove that the instances of 'snarky' vs. those of 'bitchy' or 'irony' on the internet in association with blogs. without attempting to be any one of those three, might we submit that someone has too much time on their hands?

but dr. nunberg finds that blogs have a distinguished pedigree in literary tradition, likening them to addison and steele, herb caen, hunter s. thompson, and even plato's accounts of socrates. woah! don't ask us to drink any hemlock to prove his point, but yes, we do think of ourselves, and our buddies on our blog roll (and even those whom we can't stand to read) as following in the footsteps of writers who believe that the only way the human race works is with communication.

and happily, blogging lets anybody who knows how to type get their feelings across to whomever wants to click on a link to those words, though dr. nunberg thinks the informality of blogs is somehow a detriment, go figure:

but in some ways they're also more exclusionary...the high, formal style of the newspaper op-ed page may be nobody's native language, but at least it's a neutral voice that doesn't privilege the speech of any particular group or class. whereas blogspeak is basically an adaptation of the table talk of the urban middle class -- it isn't a language that everybody in the cafeteria is equally adept at speaking. not that there's anything wrong with chewing over the events of the day with the other folks at the lunch table, but you hope that everybody in the room is at least reading the same newspapers at breakfast.
ok, dr. nunberg, now, don't get us wrong, we are quite flattered that our blog is one of the handful you not only mention, but link to.

however, saying that the "neutral tone" of the op-ed page is more accessible than blogging, is like pronouncing that tomes on linquistics are more entertaining than poems. there's a lot to be said for the familiar, and the decidedly-point-of-view infused.

(we'd hate to see what he thinks about rap lyrics!)

and another wonderful thing about blogs, is that, indeed, nobody can read all the same newspapers at breakfast, and thus, is able to find stories and articles brought to their attention by bloggers who have read those other publications.

all in all, we are quite pleased that dr. nunberg uses our humble space as an example of blogging in his article (if only to point out the phenomenon of pseudonymity, but as oscar wilde said, we'd rather be talked about than not talked about).

he makes some interesting points, some valid, some flaccid, but a link is a link, and we'll take it! (plus, we love terry gross's melodious voice!)
posted by skippy at 5:39 PM | 0 comments
happy blogiversary (yes! talkleft coined that phrase!)

to eschaton, the third most read blog in blogtopia (and you know who coined that phrase!)

atrios, aside from being a gracious gentleman who always returns our emails, and happily swapped tom tomorrow's autographed book when tom's press agent mixed up atrios' address with ours, is also a regular feature on the majority report radio show, and closing in fast on instapundit in terms of daily hits!

happy 2nd blogiversary, atrios!
posted by skippy at 2:59 PM | 0 comments
the ol' skippy mailbag

marc's cyberspace travels questions the use of using the phrase "silver bullet" in an ad calling for donations to the marines in iraq.

foxwell links us to an laweekly article detailing gov. gropinator's plan to slash a program for in-home care for people with diabilities...thus destroying thousands of jobs at the same time.

our demonstration buddy schro in los angeles sends us an article from the disclosure project that wonders if the oil that u.s. soldiers are dying for is really for us, or for future sale to china.

and ned at digestible news offers both an excellent oyster recipe and plug for us at the same time. you can't beat that!
posted by skippy at 2:50 PM | 0 comments

Friday, April 16, 2004

but there's no comment section

atrios shows us the freeway blogger craze.

Labels: ,

posted by skippy at 12:38 PM | 0 comments
some tasty bits from the cookie

jj at the daily cookie sends us some links:

here's a story from the daily iowan that says the white house refused to let student newspapers cover awol's recent visit.

the iowa state daily; the daily iowan, the student newspaper at the university of iowa; and the dmacc chronicle, the student newspaper of the ankeny campus of des moines area community college, were all left off the approved list to cover the presidential visit…

"we took all the right steps to get in, and we got screwed in the end," said scott mussell, photographer for the dmacc chronicle.

mike allsup, reporter for the chronicle, said the paper had faxed press credential information to the white house press office at 11 a.m. tuesday, a full day before the due date.

"i think they missed out on a huge opportunity for getting the president's message out to students," he said.

allsup said he was later contacted by the white house press office and told the president didn't want students covering the event in des moines.

"the fact they called me and told me that really pissed me off," he said.
and here's the apprentice starring awol.
posted by skippy at 12:31 PM | 0 comments
the lastest iraqi craze - kidnapping businessmen

an american business man was kidnapped from his hotel in basra, as well as a danish business man, reports cbsnews:

a u.s. businessman was abducted from his hotel in the southern city of basra by kidnappers disguised as policemen, basra police chief said friday.

col. khalaf al-maleki said the abduction of the american, who was of jordanian origin, took place thursday night. he had no further details.

also friday, denmark's foreign ministry said a danish businessman was believed kidnapped, while a sunni leader said a chinese citizen was released.
unfortunately addendum: reports now have it that the businessman captured in basra was jordanian, and not american.

however, that's not the worst news. msnbc is reporting that the u.s. embassy in qatar has a tape of a u.s. soldier which has been taken hostage. we'll bring you more when we can find it.
posted by skippy at 10:31 AM | 0 comments
us knew a year ago wmds awol

just one girl found an observer story that says american officials knew within three weeks of the fall of baghdad that there were no wmd's.

apparently nobody told awol, because he's still looking for them (as of last tuesday's press conference).
posted by skippy at 10:23 AM | 0 comments

Thursday, April 15, 2004

at the movies

usually, we are a politically-themed organ, but forgive us while we foray into cultural observation:

be sure to check out the newest comedies opening soon:

jennifer garner stars in big.

and nia vardalos and toni collette star in victor/victoria.

erratum: upon analysis of the plot of the nia vardalos movie, we realized we incorrectly labeled it as "victor/victoria." we would like to correct that misunderstanding:

nia vardalos and toni collette star in some like it hot.

we regret the error.
posted by skippy at 6:00 PM | 0 comments
top ten reasons to keep laughing at awol

late night with david letterman continues to be some of the most inciscive political commentary on television. last night, dave told us:

on cia george tenent testifying before the 911 commission: he said we're still making the same dumb mistakes. like leaving memos on the president's desk.

on awol's press conference: i thought he looked calm, i thought he looked confident, i thought he looked focused...that's right, he's drinking again.

on the press conference in general: it was tough for president bush, he spent the first ten minutes trying to pronounce "fallujah."

on awol insisting iraq is not another viet nam: of course not, he avoided viet nam.

on the shuffling noise heard during the press conference: i called my buddy down at the white house, kenny, and he said "oh, that was john kerry measuring for drapes."
posted by skippy at 3:55 PM | 0 comments
say hello

to purple states.
posted by skippy at 3:42 PM | 0 comments
happy belated blogday

a big hunk a hunk a burnin' love and a shout out to our peeps over at the rittenhouse review, which celebrated their second anniversary yesterday.

jim capazzola was one of the very first to endorse and support skippy's efforts in blogtopia (y!wctp!) and we wish nothing but good things for him in the future.

be sure to read the rittenhouse review on a regular basis!
posted by skippy at 3:39 PM | 0 comments
happy tax day from the bush economic team

initial unemployment claims rose by over 30,000 this week, way more than any one except real people expected. cnnmoney:

the number of americans filing for unemployment insurance jumped by 30,000 last week to the highest level since february, the government reported thursday, with the figure well above economists' expectations.

initial claims for unemployment insurance rose to 360,000 in the week ended april 10 from a revised 330,000 the previous week, the . labor department reported. the figure was above economists' estimates of 335,000 first-time claims, according to brieifing.com.

the increase in initial claims was the largest weekly rise since december 2002.
be sure to pay your taxes!
posted by skippy at 12:21 PM | 0 comments
the perception that "perception is reality" is not reality - a skippy rant

we have always thought, at the end of the day, that our side will prevail, because we have reality to back us up.

we know that a popular meme, attributed to goebbels, is that if you repeat a lie often, enough it becomes the truth. we know the self-righteous wing relies on that idea, and with its control of the corporate media, seems to actually believe the idea that if you get everybody to accept something as reality, it actually is reality.

however, and this is what has always comforted us in the dark dark nights as we lay in our bed wondering what the hell is happening to the world, that meme is not the truth. that meme is, itself, a perception of the truth.

in other words...you can convince everybody that if they step off a cliff, the good lord will lift them up to safety in his arms in heaven. you can repeat that over and over, and have all the faux news anchors pound away at it, as well as rush and sean and bill and laura and ann and all the radio demagogues emphatically shout it again and again over the radio waves. you can have it as a cover story on newsweek and time every week, and you can even shut down any radio network that dares to oppose the idea.

however...

just because everybody in the country perceives it to be true, doesn't make it reality. the second someone steps off a cliff, the laws of physics are going to take over and, though the person will eventually perhaps end up in heaven in the safety of the lord's arms, that person will first plunge downward to a painful end at the bottom of the cliff.

our point? "perception is reality" does not apply to the laws of reality. and that includes the laws of economics, the laws of political science, the laws of nature, and the even the laws of terre haute, indiana. sooner or later, reality will intrude.

and, unfortunately for the self-righteous wing of the repubbblican party, it's sooner or later now.

case in point: we watched wolf's on vacation so some bimbo is reading the news on cnn today. whoever the news repeater was filling in for wolf had the usual "hot topic" segment, with two screeching heads "debating" a point.

today's heads were korel bouley from kgo radio on the left, and mark simone from wabc radio on the right.

usually, mark is a pit bull, never letting his opponent finish a sentense, let alone make a point, shouting out repubbb memes right and left (well, actually, right and right). but today, for some reason, he was rather timid in his performance, as korel scored point after point after point discussing awol's "brown people need democracy" speech from tuesday night.

korel said americans wanted an apology from awol. mark countered that presidents don't apologize, it's too "dr. phil" touchy-feely, did korel want an apology from fdr for pearl harbor?

before mark could even finish, korel shot back with "we demanded an apology from clinton for having sex, i think that the deaths of hundreds of americans in an unnecessary war is more important."

mark had no come back. he sat there. he could say nothing.

another example of reality intruding on the repubbb's meme: korel pointed out that a year ago, awol flew a jet fighter onto the aircraft carrier to announce "mission accomplished," and the major hostilities were over in iraq.

mark countered with, no, he was saying that major hostilities in afghanistan were over. (that was a new one on us).

but the bimbo news repeater interrupted with reality: "i was there on the deck of the carrier, mark, and that is what president bush said," she corrected.

reality is intruding into the self-righteous wing's memes so badly, that even news repeaters are actually starting to stick to reality. who would a thunk?

keep your eyes open for more examples of reality interferring with the repubbbs' memes. we'll get back to you with more.
posted by skippy at 12:14 PM | 0 comments
fan mail from some flounders

the daily cookie is mad that cheney got paid more from halliburton last year than from his job as the vice president (and jj also wishes us a happy jackie robinson day!)

reader and contributor rose sends us a link to this reuters story that debunks awol's story about finding "50 tons of mustard gas on a turkey farm" in libya (it was not 50 tons, it was not mustard gas, and it was not a turkey farm. but when al gore talks about a little girl not having a desk in her florida school, it's a top story in the national review).

and ned at the digestible news brings us the salon story about mercs in iraq. (gotta view an ad, but you do it every night when you watch tv, don't ya?)
posted by skippy at 11:48 AM | 0 comments
america voted...and awol is not coming back next week

opinions you should have has a great take on awol's "brown people should have democracy" speech on tuesday...mainly, that it pre-empted american idol!

fans of the fox television show "american idol" tuned in last night and voted immediately and resoundingly to bounce the president from the show…

simon cowell was particularly harsh. "i don't know why you think you have a chance in this business," he told bush, and called it "perhaps the worst performance of elton john i have ever witnessed."
personally, we wish awol was on another reality show.
posted by skippy at 11:37 AM | 0 comments
the 411 on 911

chuck simmons, our friend from across the political aisle, reminds us that the 911 commission has vetted the flying of saudi nationals out of closed air space on 9/20. the nytimes tells us:

the six chartered flights that rushed scores of saudi citizens out of the united states after the attacks of sept. 11, 2001, were handled properly by the bush administration, the independent commission investigating the attacks said in a statement on tuesday.

a flight on sept. 20, 2001, carried 26 passengers, most of them relatives of osama bin laden, according to the statement. but all 142 passengers on the flights, mostly saudi citizens, were screened by law enforcement officials, the statement said, to ensure that they were not security threats and not wanted for questioning. the flights were "dealt with in a professional manner" by the government, the commission said.
chuck, we admit when the other side scores a legitimate point, and good for you. however your link to the nytimes is broken.

the bad news coming out of the commission is that awol saw several memos warning that bin laden was plotting something nasty. the washpost says:

by the time a cia briefer gave president bush the aug. 6, 2001, president's daily brief headlined "bin ladin determined to strike in us," the president had seen a stream of alarming reports on al qaeda's intentions. so had vice president cheney and bush's top national security team, according to newly declassified information released yesterday by the commission investigating the sept. 11, 2001, attacks.

in april and may 2001, for example, the intelligence community headlined some of those reports "bin laden planning multiple operations," "bin laden network's plans advancing" and "bin laden threats are real”…

"reports similar to these were made available to president bush in the morning meetings with [director of central intelligence george j.] tenet," the commission staff said.

the information offers the most detailed account to date of the warnings the intelligence community gave top bush administration officials, and it provides the context in which a cia briefer put together a memo on osama bin laden's activities in the aug. 6 brief for bush.
nice context. too bad they didn't give awol the seat numbers of the hi-jackers on 9/11, because apparently that's the only way he would have been able to do anything.
posted by skippy at 10:51 AM | 0 comments

Wednesday, April 14, 2004

the missing links

we all remember the fra-kos about various democratic candidates linking to the daily kos, who thought that people who chose to make a living in a hot war zone by working outside of the military (where they could be held accountable) really had to take some responsibility for whatever happened to them.

jerome armstrong of mydd has an excellent analysis of the republicans' problem with the internet (except he has the apostrophe in the wrong place on "republican's").

but brad carson, unlike sumer's tent-folding to the rightwinger attack (whom kerry's blog followed in pattern), responded with the right attitude. mock and condecension. stephanie herseth's play-nice response on the "secret website" claim was an effective reframing of the issue as well, but the hard hit-back is going to be more effective in stopping this nonsense. if the republicans are going to try to use a fundamental part of the internet for their partisan gain -- linkage -- then democratic candidates should just ignore the partisan snipping, or publically mock their ignorance in return.
jerome also directs us to this las vegas review journal aritcle that explores the issue further.
posted by skippy at 5:18 PM | 0 comments
the passion of the sloganator

jj of the daily cookie sends us this link to the sloganator memorial...a bit of animation dedicated to the posters made at bush/cheney04's expense by the subversive and funny among us, first brought to blogtopia's (y!wctp!) attention by wonkette, she who refuses to link to skippy.

and speaking of linkage, and of the daily cookie, we are proud to add jj's site to our permanent blogroll, along with kelley kramer and needlenose.
posted by skippy at 4:48 PM | 0 comments
off the air america

due to a contract dispute with the licensing company, air america radio has been taken off the air in los angeles and chicago, the 2nd and 3rd largest market in the fledging network. the latimes:

arthur liu, owner of multicultural radio broadcasting, which owns air america affiliates wntd-950 am in chicago and kbla-1580 am in los angeles, said air america bounced a check and owes him more than $1 million.

air america and multicultural had entered into a time brokerage agreement in which the network was essentially renting multicultural's airtime, liu said.

"they bounced a check today," liu said. "it's a default. they have paid only a very small portion of what they owe us." liu declined to say how much multicultural is owed, but did say he is holding $1 million in checks that air america has asked the company not to cash…

"that is an outright lie," said evan cohen, air america's chairman, in a statement. "multicultural radio broadcasting's conduct in this matter has been disgraceful.... [i]t is a clear violation of their contractual obligations."

air america filed a complaint today in new york state supreme court charging multicultural with breaching their contract and seeking an injunction to force multicultural to restore the air america broadcast on both stations…

a chicago source familiar with the situation said a multicultural representative showed up at wntd's offices this morning, kicked out air america's lone staffer overseeing the network's feed to the station from new york, switched over to a spanish-language feed, and changed the locks on the doors.

liu said the same thing happened at kbla in los angeles.
a statement released by air america (thanks to morons.org):

air america radio is temporarily unable to be heard on wntd in chicago and kbla in los angeles, but chicago and los angeles listeners can still hear our broadcast on the web at airamericaradio.com and on xm satellite radio (channel 167).

multicultural radio broadcasting's conduct in this matter has been disgraceful. to shut off a broadcast that listeners rely on without warning and in the middle of discussions is the height of irresponsibility and a slap in the face of the media industry. in addition, it is a clear violation of their contractual obligations, and we are seeking legal remedies against them in court.
we recommend listeing to the live web stream.

addendum: thanks to our buddy eric at the hamster, we found the brief for the actual breach of contract suit over at smoking gun.
posted by skippy at 12:52 PM | 0 comments
welcome, the one guy who clicked the link on the washington monthly

we are of mixed emotions over the blogger formerly known as calpundit (yes! we coined that phrase, too!) and his great good fortune to be blogging for $$$ at washington monthly.

on one hand, we're pleased as punch that kevin has increased his visibility and readership. it couldn't happen to a more deserving individual (except us, maybe).

however, he has changed the format of his blogroll for space reasons. now you have to go to the bottom of his blog, click a button, use a pull-down menu and search for skippy the bush kangaroo.

when kevin was at calpundit, we registered about a sixth of our daily hits from his blog. but now, we get more people surfing in from gweilo diaries than washmonthly.

so kevin's good luck has debilitated our hit rate. not that we're blaming him. he's still writing good stuff, and we highly recommend his work.
posted by skippy at 12:43 PM | 0 comments
say hello

to iddybud
posted by skippy at 9:12 AM | 0 comments

Tuesday, April 13, 2004

apology awol from awol


awol's press conference
didn't provide any information that the world didn't already know; namely, the man is in waaaaay over his head.

rambling, stuttering, hesitant, what little content he had was constantly repeated, dodging, clumsily dancing around points...if he was in any other position in the world he would be fired; if he were in school he'd be held back; if he were in an alley he'd be held up; if he were our kid he'd be slapped silly.

all in all, we agree with tom shales in the washpost:

"when i say something, i mean it," george w. bush said decisively near the end of last night's prime-time presidential news conference. nobody called out, "when will you say something?" -- the white house press corps is too mannerly for that -- but some reporters, and some viewers, must have been thinking it.
awol, in answer to a question about richard clarke's apology on behalf of the government to the people of america, refused to offer an apology of his own. he also was unable to think of a mistake he had made in the past three years.

[ed. note: save it. we've got a million punchlines to that one, and we know you do, too. let's just let the easy ones slide, ok?]

it does look like he's ready to send more troops to iraq. and he mentioned mustard gas on a turkey farm so much that we thought he was talking about his lunch today.

the good news is, awol said he will stake his re-election on iraq.

the bad news is, he expects the same 5 supreme court justices to vote just like they did 4 years ago.

now, if we can just get the 24 million people who call in every week for american idol to vote democrat in november, they can take revenge for awol's pre-empting fantasia vs. simon tonight.


cross-posted at mydd, and the daily kos, and the american street.
posted by skippy at 11:28 PM | 0 comments
ashcroft: blame clinton

in a move that would only surprise mel carnahan, att. gen. john ashcroft placed the blame for 9/11 squarely on bill clinton's shoulders during his testimony today before the 911 commission. scripps "don't call me moe" howard news service tells us:

ashcroft said secret orders that president bill clinton gave the cia had to be rewritten because they did not permit the agency to kill the al qaeda leader, but only to capture him.

"it was so complex and convoluted that it would be paralytic," he said of clinton's directive.
however, former interim director of the fbi thomas "don't call me captain" pickard contradicted the spirit, if not the gist, of ashcroft's testimony:

pickard said ashcroft told him to stop talking about the al qaeda threats.

"he did not want to hear about this anymore," pickard said. "that is correct."

ashcroft flatly denied this happened.

"i did never say to him that i did not want to hear about terrorism," ashcroft said. ashcroft said that even before the 9/11 attacks he approved a large funding increase for counter-terrorism in the justice department and had pressed pickard on what the terrorists were up to.

"my no. 1 priority was terrorism," he said.
however, bloomberg points out that the facts seem to contradict this stand:

a pair of reports released by the commission this morning says ashcroft didn't make counterterrorism a priority before sept. 11.

ashcroft's justice department issued a list of budget priorities in may 2001, citing gun violence and illegal drugs while making no mention of counterterrorism, one of the reports said. the report said that dale watson, head of the fbi's counterterrorism division, ``told us that he almost fell out of his chair'' when he saw that list.

on sept. 10, 2001, ashcroft rejected an appeal by the acting fbi director, thomas pickard, for additional counterterrorism funds, the report says. the fbi is an arm of the justice department.

a second staff report included another anecdote that portrayed ashcroft as putting a low priority on counterterrorism. it said pickard met weekly with ashcroft in late june and july of 2001 as the government was inundated with reports of possible terror threats.

pickard told the commission that ``after two such briefings the attorney general told him he did not want to hear this information anymore,'' the report said. ashcroft, his former deputy and his chief of staff all dispute pickard's account, the report added.
strangely enough, for a in-depth screeching head news network analysis of today's hearings, hardball with chris matthews is a good place to look. matthews is once again hosting, among others, commissioner ben-veniste and the 9/11 widows to discuss today's activity.

we will bring you a link to the transcripts as son as they are available.
posted by skippy at 4:29 PM | 0 comments
wwwthe ol' skippy mailbag

needlenose alerts us to the google bomb war, where our side is trying to get waffles to show awol.

chuck currie is interviewing various progressive christian leaders who are actively working to defeat awol.

and our buddy jj at the daily cookie links us to the snarky cat, who asks what did ashcroft know and when did he know it?
posted by skippy at 4:02 PM | 0 comments

Monday, April 12, 2004

dear greta...your new look is fabulous!

a daily kos diary pointed out this piece on faux news by greta van "how's my lips" susteren. apparently the majority (read: all) of her email over the weekend is 100% against awol and the iraqi war. she is stumped.

this does not mean that no one supports president bush (and i can easily miss a favorable e-mail since there are so many e-mails plus spam.) it does mean that i had a difficult time finding e-mails from those who supports the president and who e-mailed me in the last 36 or so hours. the number supporting him and writing me in the last 36 hours is very few -- i could not find one…
too bad, greta. we suppose you won't like the email we sent you, either:


dear ms. van sustern,

we agree with the majority of your emails in reference to bush and the pdb and the iraqi war. with the release of the declassified pdb, and the information coming out of the 911 commission hearings, two things have become obvious:

george w. bush is far over his head in his abilities to handle the job he currently has. he is a short-sighted manager, surrounding himself with syncophants, and he is truly unable to listen to, let alone consider, viewpoints opposing his own.

secondly, we as a nation were lied to, not only about the reasons for the war, but about the very nature of the administration's approach to terrorism and 9/11 and osama bin laden.

even irrespective of the terrible deficits his administration has saddled this country with, his mismanagement in world affairs have wounded this country's ability to lead, if not survive. he has made the united states into a devil and an enemy in most of the world's eyes. we as a naiton will be hard pressed to scrape out of the current mess within a decade's time.

he lies to our troops overseas, dying for an unnecessary war, he lies to the people here at home, losing jobs and rights. if he were in any other position in the world he would have been fired long ago.

how we wish donald trump were in charge of bush's future!

yours,
etc.




posted by skippy at 11:10 PM | 0 comments
say hello

to functional ambivalent.
posted by skippy at 6:38 PM | 0 comments
without a net

things must be going pretty damn bad for awol, because he's actually going to hold a press conference tomorrow night. reuters:

president bush will hold his first formal press conference of the year on tuesday to discuss the situation in iraq, where u.s. forces are battling both sunni and shi'ite muslim insurgents, the white house said.

the east room of the white house is usually reserved for formal events. only two of bush's 11 press conferences have been held there -- one on oct. 11, 2001, in the wake of the sept. 11 attacks, and another on march 6, 2003, on the eve of the iraq invasion, the white house said.
posted by skippy at 4:18 PM | 0 comments
and the hits just keep on coming

a big shout out to our peeps over at ampoljo and seeing the forest for their linkage to our pdb rant, and all the traffic that ensued. thanks, kids!
posted by skippy at 3:55 PM | 0 comments
wwwd?

what would w do? probably nothing.

it's just a small gag we are trying, without success, to make into a joke. but we bring it up as way of introduction to our musing on james pinkerton's latest column.

mr. pinkerton, as readers of this space might know, is one conservative that we find ourselves agreeing with more than we would normally think. granted, he starts out this piece with a hypothetical that gets our dander up immediately:

if you knew that president franklin d. roosevelt had received a memo a month before pearl harbor entitled, "japanese determined to attack the united states in the pacific," and that he had done nothing about that information, would that knowledge change your perception of fdr as a wise war leader?
we were all set to trot out a joke (that did work) about a strawman dancing so hard it should star in a 30's musical with judy garland. after all, fdr was not the kind of man who would do nothing about it. also, fdr did not invade china while telling america there was a connection to the japanese.

but then we decided to read the rest of mr. pinkerton's work. he points out that the news of awol's lack of action on the pdb memo is going to hurt his image as a "war time leader." he takes us back to the questioning of dr. condoleeza gibbons by the 911 commission:

but [ben-veniste] wasn't prohibited from asking rice the title of the pdb. and she obliged: "i believe the title was, 'bin laden determined to attack inside the united states.'" ouch. just moments after she had said intelligence was "not specific" about the place of attack, here's a presidential-level document warning, specifically, that al-qaida's target wasn't overseas somewhere, but rather the united states itself…

rice's semi-admission - she was under oath, but that doesn't guarantee that every witness will tell whole truth - stirred up bob kerrey, another commissioner...

"in the spirit of further declassification," he announced, "this is what the august 6th memo said to the president: that the fbi indicates patterns of suspicious activity in the united states consistent with preparations for hijacking. that's the language of the memo that was briefed to the president on the 6th of august."

ouch again. "hijacking" is pretty darn specific - which seems to contradict rice's assertion that the intelligence was "frustratingly vague" as to the "manner of attack."

plenty of people in washington had their "hair on fire" about the terror threat in the summer of 2001. but not bush, apparently. on aug. 4, he went off on a working vacation to his ranch in texas.

according to white house speechwriter turned memoirist david frum, that summer bush "did something i had never seen him do: he brooded." yet the issue wasn't terror; it seems it was stem cell research. on aug. 9, bush gave his first primetime policy speech to the nation - on the topic of embryos. after that, according to frum, bush launched a "mini-political campaign" that took him out on the stump.

and we all know what happened the following month.

what we don't know is the precise sequence of events that led to the government's pearl harbor-like cluelessness on 9/11. but there's at least a chance now, as documents are revealed and as officials testify under oath, that we'll find out. in the meantime, here's a prediction, based on what we know already: bush won't dare show more 9/11 images in his campaign ads.

ouch again.

(thanks and a tip of the bush kangaroo hat to the hamster for the link!)
posted by skippy at 12:20 PM | 0 comments
be all you can be...for $1000 a day

cursor, the best of the media-culling blogs, brings us some more interesting links to news about the mercenaries operating in iraq.

the washpost talks extensively about this phenomenon:

under assault by insurgents and unable to rely on u.s. and coalition troops for intelligence or help under duress, private security firms in iraq have begun to band together in the past 48 hours, organizing what may effectively be the largest private army in the world, with its own rescue teams and pooled, sensitive intelligence...

"each private firm amounts to an individual battalion," said one u.s. government official familiar with the developments. "now they are all coming together to build the largest security organization in the world."
however, not everyone thinks this is such a great idea:

some defense department officials are concerned that private commandos are not subject to adequate oversight. there is no government vetting of contract workers who carry weapons. "the cpa [coalition provisional authority] has let all kinds of contracts to all kinds of people," said one senior defense department official who asked not to be named because of the sensitivity of the subject. "it's blindsided us”…
though the article doesn't come right out and connect cause to effect, it details examples of the mercenary army not getting support from the military:

in all three instances, u.s. and coalition military forces were called for help but did not respond in a timely manner, according to u.s. government and industry accounts. the private commandos fought for hours and eventually were able to "self-evacuate," said one u.s. official, who asked not to be named.

asked last night to explain why u.s. and coalition forces had not responded to requests for help, a pentagon spokesman referred the question to commanders in iraq, who could not be reached for comment because of the time difference.
and it seems like nobody likes the privateers. this nytimes piece (via the seattle post-intelligencer) points out that the four american "contractors" who got killed in fallujah two weeks ago, may have been set up to walk into a trap:

"the truth is we got led into this ambush," toohey, vice president for government relations at blackwater, said in an interview, offering the company's first detailed account of the attack. "we were set up”…

toohey said his company's investigation of the incident, which included interviews with convoy drivers who survived the ambush, had not yet determined whether the blackwater employees were led into fallujah by active members of the iraqi civil defense corps or whether they were led into the city by impostors wearing defense corps uniforms.

but the convoy, on a mission to pick up kitchen equipment, had little cause for suspicion: the iraqi escort was prearranged and met with the convoy as planned at an intersection just east of fallujah. "they said, 'we'll escort you, show you a short way through fallujah,' " toohey said…

"the icdc blocked the road and the ambush happened," he said, referring to the iraqi civil defense corps, a force trained by the united states to guard roads and utilities and combat insurgents. the assailants first "opened up at point blank range" on the rear car, he said, and then took aim at the lead vehicle.

"this ambush didn't even take 60 seconds," toohey said.
addendum:off-topic, except that we found it via cursor, a great cartoon: you're fired!
posted by skippy at 11:50 AM | 0 comments
poetry in motion

mad kane, taking a break from song parodies, wrote a poem: ode to the august pdb.
posted by skippy at 11:20 AM | 0 comments
oh yeah, and are calico cats really the devil?

judd legum, who helps write the cap's blog, has 10 questions for john ashcroft, when he appears before the 9/11 commission tomorrow (the article is in salon, so, as usual, you have to watch an ad).

a couple of important ones:

2) why wasn't counterterrorism one of the seven strategic goals ashcroft outlined in a may 2001 memo to his division heads?

4) after 9/11, why did ashcroft slash almost $1 billion from an emergency fbi request to bolster counterterrorism efforts?

8) why, in the days after 9/11, did ashcroft, along with white house and state department officials, allow two dozen members of the bin laden and saudi royal families to circumvent faa restrictions forbidding flights and leave the country without full fbi questioning?
and one of our own: what have you got against naked breasts?
posted by skippy at 11:12 AM | 0 comments
congratulations!

you are the 400,000th visitor to skippy!

correction: newly-hired personnel in the traffic department inaccurately calculated that this event would be reached early sunday morning, and we incorrectly posted this item earlier. for those of you who thought you were indeed the 400,000th visitor, the management will honor all claims of the prize.

we regret the error.
posted by skippy at 12:08 AM | 0 comments
christ beats hellboy, the way it should be

in a fit of rapture, mel gibson's "the passion of the christ" ascended to the top of the box office this weekend, overtaking "hellboy," which fell to the number two spot.

this being easter weekend, we'd expect no less, and we are sure that, were it halloween, the reverse would have been true.

we were all set to go see hellboy, until we found out it wasn't a remake of a jerry lewis movie. we misunderstood.
posted by skippy at 12:08 AM | 0 comments

Sunday, April 11, 2004

talkleft never awol with help

we'd like to give our bud talkleft a big shout out for her recent html help with our blog. now, thanks to her, our quoted material from other sources (read: plagarized) can be seen in nice, neat little boxes, thus setting apart the content from the con.
posted by skippy at 11:27 PM | 0 comments
taking up the kos

look what we found surfing around: lgf watch.
posted by skippy at 6:40 PM | 0 comments
violence still not awol in iraq

a u.s. helicopter was shot down in western baghdad today, killing two crew members, bringing the number of american troops killed in the past two days to 16.

the csmonitor tells us that the new violence in iraq is testing the resolve of the coalition members:

• japanese prime minister junichiro koizumi has vowed to keep his nearly 550 noncombat troops in iraq, but the taking of three hostages last week - still being held at this writing - has shaken public support for the deployment, the first of its kind in postwar japan.

• opposition members in ukraine have called for the withdrawal of troops after fierce fighting last week killed one soldier and forced a withdrawal from the southern city of kut. us forces regained control of kut over the weekend.

• thailand, with 443 troops in karbala, said it would remain, but reserved the right to reconsider.

• the newly elected socialist government in spain has vowed to withdraw that country's 1,300 troops from iraq unless the united nations takes control of security and reconstruction.
one bright spot, if it can be considered bright, is that some hostages that were taken are slated to be freed. the latimes:

at least one hostage was released on sunday and more were expected to be freed. britain's foreign office said gary teeley, a british man who had reportedly been kidnapped in the southern city of nasiriyah, was safe and in the hands of coalition forces.

al-jazeera reported sunday that kidnappers said they would release eight other foreign hostages -- two turks, three pakistanis, a nepalese, a filipino and an indian. their captors claimed the men were truck drivers for the u.s.-led coalition.

in a video of the eight hostages, a spokesman for the kidnappers said they were being released. but it was unclear if the men were actually freed.

japanese officials in jordan said they were talking with unidentified people in iraq to gain the japanese hostages' release. a negotiator told the japanese government the three civilians were unharmed, held near fallouja, kyodo news reported, citing unidentified government sources.
unfortunately, an american contractor (a real contractor, not a mercenary) has been taken hostage, and is being threatened with death if the coalition doesn't lift the blockade of fallujah.
posted by skippy at 6:38 PM | 0 comments
somehow we think the "but you didn't tell me to" defense shouldn't apply to the presidency - a skippy rant

awol seems to be operating under a misunderstanding of what his job description really is. apparently, unless someone actually tells him what to do, and when, he is incapable of action. the voa news:

president bush says he received no information prior to september 11, 2001, indicating a terrorist attack on america was imminent…

"there was not a time and place of an attack," he said. "it said osama bin-laden had designs on america. well, i knew that."
ok, smarty-pants, if you need instructions, write this down: get rid of the deficit. oh, and be nice.

all sarcasm aside (well, maybe not all, this is the skippy blog), we actually have no quibble with the defense that there was no specific time and place mentioned in the memo. however, seeing that there was plenty of information that al qaeda was plotting hijackings, and wanted to strike in this country (remember the name of the memo, awol?) here is what bothers us, and has been bothering us since even before this pdb memo was declassified:

after the first plane was reported incommunicado with air traffic control on 9/11, why weren't there alarm bells at the highest level sounding loudly? why was awol still reading to a kindergarden class? why was rumsfeld still sitting at his desk? why didn't the faa notify norad immediately? why weren't interceptor planes in the air from the closest afb?

in other words, what happened to the strategic air defense of this country for that hour and a half on the morning of september 11, 2001?

oh, awol, in case you need someone to tell you: answer these questions! oh, and, be nice!


cross-posted at mydd, and the daily kos, and the american street.
posted by skippy at 5:45 PM | 0 comments
say hello

to the aktab news service and cyclopatra (where we found the subservient chicken).
posted by skippy at 5:28 PM | 0 comments
congratulations!

you are the 400,000 visitor to skippy!
posted by skippy at 12:44 AM | 0 comments

Saturday, April 10, 2004

blogging around

talkleft has two great items (of course, talkleft being talkleft, she has way more than just two great items, but these are the ones that peaked our interest): the uk guardian rates the right-wing pundits, and condi gets a bad grade from her former professor:

when the bush administration exploited the nation's anxiety over 9/11 to justify invading iraq, [professor] gilbert said, "it was the worst foreign policy decision made in living memory. "
eric alterman takes friday to muse about culture, or the lack thereof in this country.

richard morrison, running for congress in texas (taking on tom delay) isn't afraid to advertise on the daily kos.

marine's girl gives us a couple of jokes at awol's expense over at across the river.

tamara baker wonders if dr. condoleeza gibbons might not be a perjuror over at ampoljo.

politics in the zeros muses on the validity of the nytimes quoting the black panthers when writing about iraq.

david over on blogamy wonders if the us is really as polarized as the media seems to make it.

devra at bluestreak has something to say to people who link to her old old archives posts.

medrants considers the free market (or lack thereof) in the medical profession.

body and soul has ted barlow disease (though probably not a very serious case) until after easter.

re: right wing humorists...why can't dennis miller be as funny as scrapple face?

roger ailes calls jeff skilling the "courtney love" of securities fraud.

thanks to the smirking chimp, we find the newsday article about the fbi disputing condi's testimony.

busy, busy, busy is busy deconstructing insty's misrepresentation of kennedy's recent remarks.

and wonkette joins tapped and jane galt in her refusal to link to skippy. (what, are we back in high school again?)
posted by skippy at 5:01 PM | 0 comments
awol: "memo to self: no more memos!"

the white house has today released that pdb memo that caused the brouhaha. cnn tells us:

portions of the intelligence report dealing with osama bin laden's al qaeda network and dated august 6, 2001, have been redacted for national security reasons, the white house said…

the memo includes intelligence on al qaeda threats as recent as three months before the attacks…

highlights of the report include:

• an intelligence report received in may 2001 indicating that al qaeda was trying to send operatives to the united states through canada to carry out an attack using explosives. that information had been passed on to intelligence and law enforcement agencies.

• an allegation that al qaeda had been considering ways to hijack american planes to win the release of operatives who had been arrested in 1998 and 1999.

• an allegation that bin laden was set on striking the united states as early as 1997 and through early 2001.

• intelligence suggesting that suspected al qaeda operatives were traveling to and from the united states, were u.s. citizens, and may have had a support network in the country.

• a report that at least 70 fbi investigations were under way in 2001 regarding possible al qaeda cells/terrorist-related operations in the united states.
nope. no silver bullet there.

posted by skippy at 4:19 PM | 0 comments
say hello

to annie's annals.

be sure to stop by digestible news, too!
posted by skippy at 4:09 PM | 0 comments
good poll numbers even more awol for awol

newsweek's latest poll has kerry ahead of awol 50 to 43 percent.

(thanks to atrios for the link. also, why not freep this msnbc poll asking about dr. condoleeza gibbons' performance at the 911 commission?)
posted by skippy at 4:02 PM | 0 comments
how to not pay taxes: become a mercenary!

the asspress details why it's so lucrative to be an armed civilian "contractor" rather being in the military:

the u.s. occupation is "a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity for them to make big bucks," said daniel biran, a former israeli special forces soldier who is associate managing director for security practice at boston's citigate global intelligence.

the pay for private workers in dangerous places like iraq is generous. experienced people can make $1,000 a day, according to singer. the first $120,000 earned by americans working in iraq is tax-free, murray said.

and if things get too hairy, private workers - unlike soldiers - can quit.

in comparison, a green beret master sergeant with 20 years of service and getting various allowances may earn $67,000 annually, said ken mcgraw, a spokesman for the u.s. special operations command in tampa, fla.
who needs to your country when you can make the big bucks and be your own boss?
posted by skippy at 12:22 PM | 0 comments
hostage taking latest craze sweeping iraq

those crazy insurgents are jumping on the latest fad in the iraqi conflict, which is kidnapping civilian hostages. this week alone:

three japanese and eight koreans were kidnapped on thursday, and the japanese were threatened with being burned alive. luckily the koreans were released later that day.

a british contractor was kidnapped the same day in nassariya.

a canadian working for the international rescue committee, funded by unicef, was seized on friday.

stephen farrell, a journalist for the bbc, was captured and later released by two different insurgent groups.

2 americans and 4 italians were seized near baghdad yesterday.

one insurgent group claims it has 30 hostages, and threatens to decapitate them unless the coalition lifts its blockade of falljuha, according to reuters:

"we are calling for the withdrawal of american and coalition forces. we have japanese, bulgarian, israeli, american, spanish and korean hostages. their numbers are 30," a masked man holding a kalashnikov rifle said in the broadcast on saturday.

"if america doesn't lift its blockade of falluja their heads will be cut off," he said. the footage did not show any of the alleged hostages.
in other sad news out of baghdad, a top official of the red crescent (the muslim counterpart to the red cross) was killed, along with his wife, when a bomb exploded under their car on a road north of baghdad.

and a marine featured in pictures shown worldwide a year ago during the fall of baghdad was severly injured, almost a year to the day later, in fighting in falljuah.

update: reuters is reporting the group holding the 3 japanese hostages promises to release them within 24 hours.
posted by skippy at 12:05 PM | 0 comments
memo to whitehouse staff: ignore all memos

whoops! turns out that aug. 6 2001 pdf memo, or "president's daily briefing," that didn't have any specific information about al qaeda attacking the united states actually had specific information about al qaeda attacking the united states. cnn:

the so-called presidential daily briefing, or pdb, delivered to bush on august 6, 2001 -- a month before the september 11 attacks -- said there were various reports that osama bin laden had wanted to strike inside the united states as early as 1997 and continuing into the spring of 2001, the sources told the associated press.

the same month as that briefing of bush, u.s. intelligence officials received two uncorroborated reports suggesting terrorists might use airplanes, including one that suggested al-qaeda operatives were considering flying a plane into a u.s. embassy, current and former government officials said.
the washpost:

newspaper articles in may 2002 noted the briefing document's alarming title and reported that the pdb mentioned al qaeda members living in the united states and others traveling in and out of the country. a july 2003 report from a house-senate inquiry into intelligence failures said the pdb found that al qaeda "apparently maintained a support structure" inside the united states.

the same report also said the pdb mentioned "fbi judgments about patterns of activity consistent with preparations for hijackings or other types of attack," and included intelligence acquired in may 2001 that "indicated a group of bin laden supporters was planning attacks in the united states with explosives."
the nytimes:

president bush was told more than a month before the attacks of sept. 11, 2001, that supporters of osama bin laden planned an attack within the united states with explosives and wanted to hijack airplanes, a government official said friday.

the warning came in a secret briefing that mr. bush received at his ranch in crawford, tex., on aug. 6, 2001. a report by a joint congressional committee last year alluded to a "closely held intelligence report" that month about the threat of an attack by al qaeda, and the official confirmed an account by the associated press on friday saying that the report was in fact part of the president's briefing in crawford.

the disclosure appears to contradict the white house's repeated assertions that the briefing the president received about the qaeda threat was "historical" in nature and that the white house had little reason to suspect a qaeda attack within american borders.
the white house plans to declassify the memo sometime next week, so we can all see what a miserable failure awol really is.

of course, this information directly contradicts what dr. condaleeza gibbons told the 911 commission when she said there was no silver bullet to stop 911.

of course not, condi! silver bullets only work on werewolves.
posted by skippy at 12:15 AM | 0 comments

Friday, April 09, 2004

happy good friday from the bush economic team

the good news is, the number of first time unemployment claims last week was the lowest it has been in three years. cnnmoney:

first-time claims for state unemployment insurance fell an unexpectedly steep 14,000 in the week ended april 3 to 328,000 -- the lowest level since just before president bush took office -- from 342,000 the prior week, the labor department said.

the unexpectedly large fall surprised analysts and led many to predict that a trend toward more hiring was in place, especially after last month's pickup in job creation.
remember, of course, that only means the people who are applying for unemployment for the very first time, not that all the unemployed people have suddenly got jobs.

however, the bad news is, consumer confidence has slipped as low as unemployment claims. the asspress:

the ap-ipsos consumer confidence index dropped to 84.8 this week, from a reading of 97.7 in early march, when americans' feelings about the economy had shown an improvement from the previous month…

the april consumer confidence reading was taken after the government released a report last friday showing the nation's payrolls in march posted their biggest gains in four years. yet some economists believe that the preceding months of fairly lackluster job growth and a political and media spotlight on the issue of u.s. jobs migrating overseas may have heightened consumers' anxiety about their own job security.

"we've been saturated with the evils of offshoring jobs and that does start to color our perceptions," said carl tannenbaum, chief economist at lasalle bank. "i would have expected the level of comfort about jobs, though, would have been enhanced by the march employment report. but one month doesn't make a trend and there may still be lingering anxiety."
and the consumer with the biggest lack of confidence this week has to be jeffrey skilling, one of the guys that ran enron into the ground, who apparently just went nutz. the street.com tells us:

former enron chief executive jeff skilling reportedly was hospitalized early friday after police responded to calls saying he was harassing bar patrons on manhattan's upper east side.

a police source said callers accused skilling of pulling on their clothes and accusing them of being "fbi agents following me," according to the associated press.

police found skilling at 4 a.m. edt at the corner of park avenue and east 73rd street and determined he might be an "emotionally disturbed person," the source told the ap. he wasn't charged and has since left new york presbyterian hospital.

skilling was at two bars in manhattan -- american trash and the voodoo lounge -- where he allegedly pulled open patrons' clothes, the source told the ap. the bizarre behavior continued in the street, the story said.
we know how he feels. awol's economy does that to us, too.
posted by skippy at 4:13 PM | 0 comments
separated at birth?

condoleeza rice and omorosa from the apprentice?

they don't really look alike, but they are both lying manipulative opportunists who are in way over their heads.
posted by skippy at 4:00 PM | 0 comments
a skippy flashback

exactly one year ago was the fall of baghdad.

and to celebrate all the progress we've made in iraq, we are re-running, sorry, we mean bringing you the golden oldie from the skippy archives: the day the statue died.

did you write the patriot act,
and do you have faith in un’s pact?
if dick cheney tells you “no.”
do you believe in awol bush,
and should we save some arab tush,
and can you teach me how to snub nato?

well i know destruction could be mass
unless we kick iraqi ass,
we bombed them in basra.
i dig that shock and awe!
we left poor mosul in a pinch,
but israel thinks we’re a mensch,
while we were saving private lynch
the day the statue died.

i started singing
bye bye you iraqi bad guy
drove my hummer through the summer
but the bummer won’t die
and rummy’s boys drinkin’ whiskey and rye
sayin’ this’ll be the day saddam dies
this’ll be the day saddam dies.
posted by skippy at 3:37 PM | 0 comments
jersey girls play hardball

as promised yesterday, here is the transcript of the 911 widows on the special post-rice-testimony edition of hardball:

kristen breitweiser: i would have hoped that the commissioners would have asked more pointed questions, more questions about the substance of the threats that we were facing, more about the intelligence community, what they knew where, where the breakdown of the intel information occurred, why the national security advisor did not know that planes could be used as missiles. that’s her job…

lorie van auken: we also know that people stopped flying domestically. ashcroft stopped flying. pentagon officials stop flying the day before september 11. they were warned not fly on september 11. we think san francisco mayor willie brown was told not to fly. that’s all domestic. you know, everybody keeps telling us how they were focused outward...

mindy kleinberg: you know, what’s unbelievable about that is that nobody followed that up. i mean they say that they told the faa and they told the fbi, but nobody at the faa did anything.

nobody stepped up the protocols and procedures during that threat period. nobody at the fbi knew that this threat was there.
and i would have liked them to continue to ask her, because apparently, she didn’t feel that was her responsibility...

breitweiser:…if the public was better informed in the summer of 2001, lives would have been saved. maybe the attacks wouldn’t have been prevented; but lives would have been saved.

my husband was in tower ii. if he knew that it was a terrorist attack, he wouldn’t have stayed in the building.

we spoke to a pilot’s wife, and we asked her, what do you think happened? and she said "i wish he knew that these guys knew how to fly the plane." she told us that they [pilots] were trained that they were indispensable so they wouldn’t fight a hijacking...

patty casazza: and it’s also disingenuous for the national security advisor to say she couldn’t have imagined planes being used as weapons.

in july, the president, condoleezza rice, ari fleischer, karen hughes, and karl rove attended the general summit in italy. the national security advisor of that nation was aware of an assassination attempt to be committed upon our president and the leaders attending that g8 summit in july.

how do you forget, two months later, the threat of your life, the president’s life, and not think that that threat could actually follow you home to the united states?
here's a video of the women speaking to tweety pie, and here's a transcript of the regular edition of hardball, also with the jersey girls.
posted by skippy at 3:18 PM | 0 comments
disturbing photos from fallujah

david marsden of asticle.com sends us a link to portland indy media, which shows some extremely disturbing photos from the recent fighting in fallujah.

warning! not for the faint of heart. these are graphic depictions of what war really is like.
posted by skippy at 12:39 PM | 0 comments
don't be awol at los angeles demonstration today

if you're in socal, be sure to show up for an impromptu anti-iraq-invasion demonstration at the veterans building in westwood (11000 wilshire blvd.) today at 5 pm.

more from answer.
posted by skippy at 12:36 PM | 0 comments
boycott the outrage

talkleft is aghast, or at least a bit gassy, at the words the blogger formerly known as calpundit (yes! we coined that phrase, too!) recently wrote:

i'd like to see videotaping required for all police interviews, and in return i'd suggest that the 5th amendment right against self-incrimination be discarded. if police interviews are all recorded and trials are all held in public, it's not at all clear to me what value the 5th amendment right to silence has anymore.

sure, it'll never happen. but with star chambers a thing of the past and videotaping preventing coerced confessions, i really do wonder if the self-incrimination clause of the 5th amendment has enough value left to make it worth the problems it causes. i suspect it doesn't.
talkleft is incensed, or else uses incense, we're not sure which. but we agree. it's time for a blogcott (y!wctp,t!)!

we call for john kerry to de-link from kevin drum!

we call for all of blogtopia to call up all the advertisers that advertise on instapundit and tell them we're not going to any university in tennessee!

we are starting a special fund for all the children of police who are videotaped! (send your money to this blog, c/o skippy)

we demand an apology from somebody, and soon!

we will not rest until we sleep!


cross-posted at mydd, and the daily kos, and the american street.
posted by skippy at 12:41 AM | 0 comments
say hello

to brick prison pundits and factivism and second shift, who makes an excellent point that, if 911 was all clinton's fault, why is awol withoholding clinton's archives on the subject?

an excellent point, wrench head!
posted by skippy at 12:40 AM | 0 comments

Thursday, April 08, 2004

george clooney does trance

say hello to the world around you, who links us to a techno remix of man of constant sorrow (from brother, where art thou?)
posted by skippy at 7:24 PM | 0 comments
fun with google!

just try it!
posted by skippy at 7:03 PM | 0 comments
will mel gibson play peter rabbit?

tbogg brings us this bit of news:

what was supposed to be an easter celebration for children reportedly turned into a demonstration of how jesus christ was crucified...

"it was absolutely horrendous," melissa salzmann said. "we left after about 45 minutes, it was so bad."

residents quote performers as saying, "there is no easter bunny" and breaking eggs meant for an easter egg hunt.

a portrayal of the easter bunny being whipped and tortured as the 12 stations of the cross reportedly was part of the show.
we bet the movie will make millions (especially if petco papers the house)!
posted by skippy at 6:57 PM | 0 comments
the shi'ite hits the fan

both billmon and blah3 direct us to this australian news.com article: the shi'ites and the sunnis unite to march through coalition roadblocks around fallujah:

thousands of sunni and shiite muslims forced their way through us military checkpoints thursday to ferry food and medical supplies to the besieged sunni bastion of fallujah where us marines are trying to crush insurgents.

troops in armoured vehicles tried to stop the convoy of cars and pedestrians from reaching the town located 50 kilometers west of baghdad.

but us forces were overwhelmed as residents of villages west of the capital came to the convoy's assistance, hurling insults and stones at the beleaguered troops.

some 20 kilometers west of baghdad, a us patrol was attacked just moments before the iraqi marchers arrived. armed insurgents could be seen dancing around two blazing military vehicles.

two us humvees tried to stop the marchers but were forced to drive off as residents joined the marchers, shouting "allahu akbar" (god is greater).

us troops again blocked the highway further west, but were forced to let the iraqis past as they came under a hail of stones…

the cross-community demonstration of support for fallujah had been organized by baghdad clerics both sunni and shiite amid reports that the death toll in the town had reached 105 since late tuesday.

the rare display of unity came after shiite radicals launched an uprising in cities across central and southern iraq, shattering a year of relative tolerance of the us-led occupation from the country's majority community.
this is not a good sign.
posted by skippy at 6:44 PM | 0 comments
when the going gets tough, the tough get singing

the compassionate conservative has two new songs about awol, including bush (a la michael jackson's "ben"), and not my president, not my war.
posted by skippy at 6:34 PM | 0 comments
crow with a side of rice

dr. condoleeza gibbons probably did more harm than good to awol's presidency with her testimony today, thanks in part to the tough questioning by bob "don't call me john" kerrey and richard ben-veniste.

we think the et tu, brute moment was when ben-veniste got dr. rice, after much wrangling and dissembling, to admit the title of the now infamous august 6 memo that awol ignored while on a month long vacation during august of 2001:

ben-veniste: did you tell the president, at any time prior to august 6th, of the existence of al-qaida cells in the united states?

rice: first, let me just make certain ...

ben-veniste: if you could just answer that question, because i only have a very limited ...

rice: i understand, commissioner, but it's important ...

ben-veniste: did you tell the president ...

rice: ... that i also address ...

(applause)

it's also important that, commissioner, that i address the other issues that you have raised. so i will do it quickly, but if you'll just give me a moment.

ben-veniste: well, my only question to you is whether you ...

rice: i understand, commissioner, but i will ...

ben-veniste: ... told the president.

rice: if you'll just give me a moment, i will address fully the questions that you've asked...

[ed. note: here she dances around the point better than twyla tharpe danced around barnard.]

...i really don't remember, commissioner, whether i discussed this with the president.

ben-veniste: thank you.

rice: i remember very well that the president was aware that there were issues inside the united states. he talked to people about this. but i don't remember the al-qaida cells as being something that we were told we needed to do something about.

ben-veniste: isn't it a fact, dr. rice, that the august 6th pdb warned against possible attacks in this country? and i ask you whether you recall the title of that pdb?

rice: i believe the title was, bin laden determined to attack inside the united states.

now, the ...

ben-veniste: thank you.
[ed. note: emphasis, and gleeful 'nyah nyah nyah nee nyah nyah,' ours]

thanks to tom tomorrow, we get the center for american progress's fact-checking of dr. rice.
posted by skippy at 1:41 PM | 0 comments
why not get jeff zucker to testify?

mrs. skippy wants to know, if even the 911 commission is still trying to find out exactly what happened on 911, how come nbc is able to make a made-for-tv movie about it?
posted by skippy at 1:11 PM | 0 comments
letters...we get letters...we get stacks and stacks of letters

reader and contributor rose sends us a link to excite.com detailing the vacation awol is taking right now as iraq burns and rice gets burned.

but don't think that awol doesn't work at his job! kelley kramer lets us know he's blogging about the almost 8 hours a week that awol put in before 9/11, and the 416 campaign trips he took during his first three years on the job!
posted by skippy at 12:48 PM | 0 comments
rice didn't convert 9/11 widows

immediately following dr. condaleeza gibbons' testimony to the 911 commission, msnbc (great poll on front page, go vote) had a special edition of hardball featuring the 9/11 widows who have consistently demanded answers from this administration.

we don't have the transcript just yet (should get it by tomorrow) but one of our interns made a couple of notes on some important remarks the ladies said:

matthews made the point that since this administration had information that al qaeda was planning a hi-jacking, then what does that say about awol's actions (sitting in a classroom reading to the kids from a book) on the morning of 911 after he heard about the first tower.

in response, mindy kleinberg said "either he was poorly briefed or he's a good actor."

kristen breitweiser said "i voted for president bush. i would hope he would have been my biggest ally. he's my biggest adversary."

patty casazza wondered why there was no military response to the planes until after the pentagon was hit, an hour and a half after the first plane was reported hijacked (something we wonder about ourselves).

we will bring you a link to the transcript as soon as its available. apparently the widows will be on hardball again later today at its regular time 7 pm eastern, 3 pm real time.

tom schaller on the daily kos has a simliar post about these ladies.
posted by skippy at 12:43 PM | 0 comments

Wednesday, April 07, 2004

why is the second-most-popular blog so racist?

the blogger formerly known as calpundit (yes! we coined that phrase, too!) points out that instapundit links to crazy people (mark kleinman points this out too).

addendum: davidnyc on daily kos points out that clearchannel, which organized the boycott against the anti-war dixie chicks, is infamous for buying out minority owned radio stations.
posted by skippy at 10:04 PM | 0 comments
fanmail from some flounders

let's open the ol' skippy mailbag...

julia of sisyphus shrugged brings us an on-the-ground report from iraq via the american street.

jj of cookies in heaven links us to rightwingeye for the goofy guy, and a baltsun article about the administration's war on pornography.

part of jon's mind includes this nytimes report that the us is raising the size of the military presence in iraq.

and spadehammer shows us a picture that makes his suspect the gay-marriage amendment must be dead in the water.

posted by skippy at 9:17 PM | 0 comments
washpost not awol with good suggestions

thanks to atrios, we find harold meyerson's washpost column which ends with a good idea:

if the bodies of the security guards killed in fallujah had not been mutilated, how many american voters would have noticed? one recent poll shows that near-plurality of americans now favors our leaving iraq. but precisely because this was not a war we had to fight, just up and leaving would be politically and morally duplicitous. we wrested control of iraq when we did not have to, and leaving it to its own devices as sectarian violence grows worse would be a dismal end. the only unequivocally good policy option before the american people is to dump the president who got us into this mess, who had no trouble sending our young people to iraq but who cannot steel himself to face the sept. 11 commission alone.
we vote for that!
posted by skippy at 5:45 PM | 0 comments
reach out and touch someone in iraq

support our troops by donating to operation uplink, which gets calling cards to our troops so they can call loved ones back home. (and, it's tax deductible!)

posted by skippy at 5:34 PM | 0 comments
violence continues un-awol-like in iraq

fighting rages across iraq unabated today, with high casualties on both sides, forcing the u.s. to consider longer rotations for the troops in iraq, ie, not letting them come home anytime soon. reuters:

u.s.-led forces are battling sunni muslim guerrillas and a spreading shi'ite uprising, with iraqi anger inflamed by a u.s. bombing of a mosque compound that witnesses say killed 25 people.

washington said on wednesday it may delay the scheduled return home of some u.s. troops in order to buttress force levels after 35 u.s. and allied soldiers were killed in the last three days in the heaviest fighting since saddam hussein's fall nearly a year ago.

"because we're in the midst of a major troops rotation, we have a planned increase in the number of u.s. troops," u.s. defence secretary donald rumsfeld told reporters at the pentagon. some 135,000 u.s. troops are now in iraq.
knight-ridder tells us that coalition forces bombed a mosque in fallujah killing several iraqi's, some reports put the number as high as 40.

in fallujah, u.s. bombs struck near a mosque. u.s. officials said one person was killed, but a bbc report placed the death toll at 40.

the death toll for coalition forces in the last two days of fighting stood at 34, including 12 marines who died tuesday in ramadi. ten of those marines were from a single company.

the iraqi death toll was much higher, perhaps more than 500. marine engineers patrolling near ramadi on wednesday reported coming across a mass grave containing up to 350 bodies of iraqis who appeared to have been killed in the fighting. it wasn't clear whether the bodies belonged to combatants, civilians or both.
also happening today, a us military copter crashed in baquoba, and a south african and a british "civilian contractor" (read: mercenary) were killed.
posted by skippy at 5:22 PM | 0 comments

Tuesday, April 06, 2004

strike three, you're awol!

via atrios, from deb peterson's column in the st. louis post-dispatch about baseball's opening day, when awol threw out the first pitch for the cardinals:

back at busch: somewhat hostile crowd complained mightily about the problems the presidential motorcade caused with regular fans trying to get into the park. a cards employee tipped moi that the team was so concerned about bush being booed that they piped in fake applause when he strode out to the mound. lamping flatly denied it. ...
the booing is confirmed by the international herald tribune:

earlier in the day, bush was greeted by a mixture of cheers and boos at busch stadium, where he threw an inside strike to st. louis catcher mike matheny before the cardinals opened against the milwaukee brewers
and, though no actual audible booing is heard, take a look at the results of the online poll the post-dispatch ran asking its readers about awol's appearance at busch stadium.


cross-posted at mydd, and the daily kos, and the american street.
posted by skippy at 5:44 PM | 0 comments
violence not awol in ramadi

a huge battle between coalition forces and the followers of al-sadr is being waged, resulting so far in the deaths of at least 12 american troops. australian news.com tells us:

twelve us soldiers have been killed in a battle west of baghdad as fighting with supporters of a firebrand iraqi cleric continues to spread through the area.

several iraqi civilians were also killed as gunfights erupted around the iraqi capital, bringing the death toll in the last three days of fighting to about 130 in the worst fighting since the war that toppled saddam hussein
we have just heard sam sedel on the majority report say that the number is as high as 18, and billmon brings us a sky news report that quotes 130 dead, though that's a bit steep, in our opinion (not that the over 600 dead in this war so far isn't steep. one person dead in this stupid ill-advised unnecessary conflict is too steep. impeach awol now!)
posted by skippy at 5:17 PM | 0 comments
raed not awol

the fans of the blog from baghdad, where is raed? will be pleased to know he has moved his blog to a new url, with a new name: raed in the middle.

change your bookmarks, and check it often for on-the-ground reporting on the iraqi confict.

erratum addendum: it's been pointed out by reader lou and jon of jon's mind, that there are more than one raeds blogging in iraq. where is raed is actually done by salam pax, whereas raed in the middle is done by, well, raed.

apparently raed is a pretty common name in iraq, just like skippy is used by more than one person, in fact, used by several people, in blogtopia (but only one skippy coined that phrase, and you know who that is!)

anti-erratum addendum: well, we were right the first time (we love saying that!). raed himself came to visit our blog, and left a comment explaining that indeed, he used to co-blog with salam on where is raed, but now does his own blog.
posted by skippy at 12:56 PM | 0 comments
violence still very much not awol in iraq

in a development that can only be more trouble for the us troops in iraq, the sunni's and the shi'ites have decided to put centuries of mutual hatred aside in order to drive the occupying forces out of iraq, reports the melbourne hearld sun:

sunni and shi'ite residents of two baghdad suburbs, once fierce enemies, said overnight they had put their differences aside to unite in their fight to oust the us occupying force from iraq.

"all of iraq is behind moqtada al-sadr, we are but one body, one people," declared sheikh raed al-kazami, in charge of the radical shi'ite cleric's offices at a mosque in the shi'ite neighbourhood of kazimiya, west of the iraqi capital...

al-kazami said residents of the sunni neighbourhood of adhamiya, a stone's throw from kazimiya, had offered their support, as had residents from ramadi and fallujah, west of baghdad, as well as residents of the northern city of mosul.

the muslim cleric, surrounded by armed bodyguards, said some sunnis had even offered to join sadr's militia.

to prove his point he displayed about 100 men in the gardens of the mosque who were armed with kalashnikov rifles and who stood ready to join the battle.
in a different story, the herald sun reports on the iraqi casualties of the past few days:

more than 100 iraqis have been killed and hundreds wounded in the past two days as coalition troops crack down on shi'ite rebels of firebrand cleric moqtada al-sadr, hospital and military sources said today.

another 20 coalition troops have been killed in the same fighting and in actions against sunni insurgents west of the capital, military sources said.

against heavy resistance overnight, us tanks and armoured vehicles started rolling into fallujah, west of baghdad, as operation vigilant resolve sought to track down insurgents behind the brutal murder of four americans last week.
cbs tells us that 7 us troops were killed today:

three soldiers were killed in separate fighting around baghdad and four u.s. marines died "as a result of enemy action" in western anbar province, the military said in two statements tuesday.

the four members of the 1st marine expeditionary force were killed monday while "conducting security and stabilization operations," it said. it gave no other details.
the bosglobe says that 20 americans have been killed since this weekend.

the bbc has an interesting profile of the mehdi army which our troops are facing.

for a complete look at the deaths from all countries in iraq, be sure to visit lunaville's iraq coalition casualties page.
posted by skippy at 12:44 PM | 0 comments
more about mercen-...er, we mean, armed civilian security contractors

with all the political correctness spewing from the right because the left isn't crying crocadile tears over the 4 armed mercenaries who got killed in fallujah last week, we reflect on the downright unadulterated luck of the rightists in this fiasco.

luck, you say? skippy, what can you possibly mean? how could the fact that four american paid security personnel got killed in fallujah be lucky for the self-righteous wing?

easy, we reply. they are lucky that the four blackwater employees who got killed were americans. because, according to bill berkowitz's musing in working for change, chances are good that one or more of them could have from south america:

with the u.s. casualty toll ticking ever upward, and its troops stretched thin on the ground, the bush administration is looking to mercenaries to help control iraq. these soldiers-for-hire are veterans of some of the most repressive military forces in the world, including that of the former chilean dictator augusto pinochet and south africa's apartheid regime.

in february, blackwater usa, a north carolina-based pentagon contractor, began recruiting "former commandos, other soldiers and seamen" from chile, offering them up to $4,000 a month "to guard oil wells against attack by insurgents," the guardian reported. the company "flew a first group of about 60 former commandos, many of who had trained under the military government of augusto pinochet, from santiago to a... [large] training camp in north carolina," wrote jonathan franklin, reporting from santiago, chile.

these recruits will eventually wind up in iraq, where they will spend six months to a year: "we scour the ends of the earth to find professionals -- the chilean commandos are very, very professional and they fit within the blackwater system," gary jackson, the president of blackwater usa, told the guardian.
the wingnuts would have had a hard time justifying a coordinated attack on the daily kos's advertisers because he mentioned he felt nothing for south american mercenaries who got killed in falljuah.

see how that luck works?

thanks and a tip of the bush kangaroo hat at the folks at resident bush for the link!
posted by skippy at 12:19 PM | 0 comments
the fra-kos moves to nathan newman

nathan newman's blog has become the next target for the wingnuts because of this post here. and here's nathan's answer:

but the hate spewing from the warhawk right reminds me why a bunch of decent progressive folks end up lining up with the answer types-- the lgf types embody the stereotype of hateful americans that lead to hate of the us around the world. lgf folks are the real source of terrorism, the reason americans aren't safe around the world. the terrorists individually are evil bastards, but the only reason they have so many people willing to hide them and protect them is because of the arrogance and hate spewed by the rightwing fringe of america.

posted by skippy at 12:07 PM | 0 comments

Monday, April 05, 2004

sparky for president

why not?
posted by skippy at 7:07 PM | 0 comments
a sad milestone

tchris, posting over at talkleft, tells us that the american war dead in iraq has now exceeded 600.

posted by skippy at 6:32 PM | 0 comments
peee-yew!

awol's job approval rating has fallen to its natural 43%, according to the pew research company.

more americans now disapprove of the way he is doing his job than approve, though by only a slight margin (47% disapprove vs. 43% approve). just four-in-ten approve of the way bush is handling the situation in iraq, his lowest rating ever and down from 59% in january. bush's evaluations on other issues – the economy, energy and even terrorism – have fallen as well. and by a wide margin (57% to 32%) the public does not think he has a clear plan for bringing the situation in iraq to a successful conclusion.
and, it doesn't look good for awol's iraq or economic policies:

just 50% of americans favor keeping troops in iraq until a stable government is established there, while 44% support bringing the troops home as soon as possible. in january, the public by nearly two-to-one favored maintaining u.s. troops in iraq until a stable government is formed (63%-32%).

the latest pew research center national survey of 790 adults, conducted april 1-4, finds just 39% approve of bush's handling of the economy, in spite of a government report released april 2 showing a sharp increase in job growth.
posted by skippy at 6:18 PM | 0 comments
does that mean condi rice is henry kissinger?

ted kennedy today likened awol to richard nixon, and said that iraq is awol's vietnam.

saying that awol is like nixon is, of course, totally ridiculous. nixon had viable domestic programs.

new york daily news gives us the skinny on kennedy (pun intended).

saying that truth has become the biggest casualty of the bush administration, kennedy said bush misled the public about the war, the economy, health care and education, eroding the nation’s reputation at home and abroad.

“as a result, this president has now created the largest credibility gap since richard nixon,” kennedy said in a speech at the brookings institution, a think tank. “he has broken the basic bond of trust with the american people.”

the senator said the government has cut unemployment benefits, failed to pay for education overhaul and is spending $134 billion more than expected on a medicare plan.
posted by skippy at 6:12 PM | 0 comments
don't say mercenary, say "security specialist"

kos, who doesn't admit to having a dog in this fight, brings us to time.com, where we find an article that explores the shadowy world of private armies:

with u.s. troops still having to battle insurgents and defend themselves, the job of protecting everyone else in iraq—from journalists to government contractors to the u.s. administrator in iraq, l. paul bremer—is largely being done by private security companies stocked with former soldiers looking for good money and the taste of danger. pentagon officials count roughly 20 private companies around the world that contract for security work, mainly in combat areas. they are finding plenty of it in iraq. scott custer, a co-director of custer battles, based in fairfax, va., says as many as 30,000 iraqis and "several thousand expats" are working for private outfits in iraq. security contractors make a lot more than the average soldier, but last week's events suggest that they may also be turning into more attractive targets for insurgents. "if they can chase us out," says custer co-director mike battles, "then in a void, they become more powerful."

"those blackwater guys," says an intelligence officer in iraq, "they drive around wearing oakley sunglasses and pointing their guns out of car windows. they have pointed their guns at me, and it pissed me off. imagine what a guy in fallujah thinks." adds an army officer who just returned from baghdad, "they are a subculture."

indeed, the relationship between the private soldiers and the real ones isn't always collaborative. "we've responded to the military at least half a dozen times, but not once have they responded to our emergencies," says custer. "we have our own quick-reaction force now." but the private firms are usually cut off from the u.s. military's intelligence network and from information that could minimize risk to their employees. noel koch, who oversaw terrorism policy for the pentagon in the 1980s and now runs transecur, a global information-security firm, says private companies "aren't required to have an intelligence collection or analytical capability in house. it's always assumed that the government is going to provide intelligence about threats." that, says koch, means "they are flying blind, often guessing about places that they shouldn't go."

it's still unclear whether the four blackwater employees found themselves in fallujah inadvertently or were on a mission gone awry. even by pentagon standards, military officials were fuzzy about the exact nature of the blackwater mission; several officers privately disputed the idea that the team was escorting a food convoy.
so cry us no crocadile tears for 4 civilians that chose to go to a war zone, got paid several times what our military personnel are getting, were not answerable to the military authority, and were probably did not have any tangible and immediate business in the most volatile and resentful part of the occupied country.

and especially don't cry "unpatriot" at any blog who refuses to cry those tears.
posted by skippy at 5:47 PM | 0 comments
letters...we get letters...we get stacks and stacks of letters

today in the ol' skippy mailbag:

left is right sends us a link to mike's post where he begs awol to pull out of iraq (we hope awol listens, but we have our doubts).

and cookies4clark (aka cookies in heaven) sends us a link to the blogging of the president, where matt stoller muses on the current fra-kos in blogtopia (yes! we coined both those terms, though we doubt that the forced marriage of "kos" to the second syllable of "fracas" will actually catch on. it only really works when spoken, and since most of skippy's readers are not from the right, chances are they don't hve to read out loud for comprehension). matt has an excellent overview and non-hysterical analysis of the whole shebang, to borrow from william hung.

but mostly, we have to agree with his perspective on mark kleinman's likening of kos to annthrax:

mark kleiman, a well-respected blogger on the left, compared markos to ann coulter. seen in light of the history of zuniga's service to his country and long honest track record versus coulter's dishonest opportunism and consistent appeals to violence towards the left, this comparison is absurd.
[emphasis, and outrage, ours]
posted by skippy at 5:11 PM | 0 comments
say hello

to pudentilla's perspective and tild~.
posted by skippy at 4:53 PM | 0 comments
hell way more popular than christ, at least at the movies

the comic-based flick 'hellboy' took in an estimated $23.5 million this weekend, thusly wiping out the competition, including 'the passion of the christ,' which fell to a dismal number 6 in the box office, according to usatoady.

also beating out our lord and savior:

the rock's walking tall was a solid second with $15.3 million, followed by scooby-doo 2: monsters unleashed with $15.1 million. disney's home on the range took in $14 million, while the prince & me captured $10 million.
but don't cry for jesus. 'the passion of the christ' has made more money than any movie this year, pulling in an incredible 330 million pieces of silver.
posted by skippy at 10:10 AM | 0 comments

Sunday, April 04, 2004

kerrying things too far

in a flash back to the way the democratic party used to be until howard dean came along, the john kerry blog has pulled their link to the daily kos because of the rightist's outcry about markos's intemperate (yet eerily accurate) remarks.

we are sorry for this move, but not surprised.

let's be perfectly honest here. in the field of nine democratic hopefuls for the party's presidential candidate, john kerry came in at #8 for us. (we'd sooner vote for nader than joe lieberman...if you don't like it, delink us!)

kerry always seemed to be more of a player than a man of integrity to us. dennis kucinich, howard dean, carol mosley braun, all seemed more like they believed what they were saying rather than saying what they thought others wanted to hear.

and al sharpton was always funnier than kerry, any day of the week.

so, we repeat, it does not surprise us that the people in charge of kerry's blog would cave to the artificial controversy over kos's comments made on his own blog.

the right, defining "politically incorrect" to its extreme, finds it intolerable that anyone could not cry a river the over deaths of four men who chose to "contract" out as hired guns in a hot war zone for $1000 a day. (by the way, if those guys from blackwater were guarding a food supply when the fallujahns killed them, what happened to the food truck? or the other guys holding the food? or why were they driving an suv if they were guarding food? well, we digress, which is, of course, the very reason we started this blog in the first place).

and john kerry, in the form of the people running his blog, would rather cave in to false outrage than stand up for a constituent's right to speak his mind in a free society. and not just any constituent, but one who has labored long and hard for the party, even when most of the people reading and posting his blog thought that the difference between democrats and a litter of newly born kittens was, the kittens had spines.

so, john kerry only reinforces his bad instincts and lack of conviction in our minds. instead of standing up and saying "enough of this great echo chamber which falsely creates toxic opinions out of whole cloth, i will listen to facts and stand by my friends," the kerry blog delinked from kos' site, even when staying linked to the democratic underground, which, though a favorite of skippy's, has expressed far more extreme thoughts (we know, we have written a lot of those extreme thoughts on the demunderground ourselves).

kudos to atrios, who voluntarily asked that kerry delink his blog, eschaton. and kudos to ohio democratic congressional candidate jeff seeman, who has taken out an ad on kos's site, not only in spite of, but because of, the false controversy.

from jeff seeman's site:

we were saddened to hear that three advertisers pulled their ads on the site because of the remarks posted on the blog. the comments may be controversial, but they are just as relevant. the ability to allow comments like those read on daily kos is a testament to the virtues this country was founded on, especially the right to free speech.

our campaign has decided that because of the recent events we will step in and advertise on www.dailykos.com. we have made this decision for two reasons:

1) we firmly believe in the first amendment and everyone's right to say whatever he or she chooses on their own website.

2) we refuse to allow our campaign to be bullied by the right wing like they bullied kos' previous advertisers.

we entered this campaign for congress based on courage and the desire to stand up to the republicans who are destroying our country with huge deficits, unjustified wars, and a blatant disregard for americans and the challenges they face in their daily lives.


we love jeff seeman! we love that he supports kos in his time of need! but mainly we love that he uses the editorial "we" just like we do! good for us!

give to jeff seeman's campaign! (and be sure to add a penny, ie, $10.01, to indicate you are a kos contributor!)

show the right that, while we are ready to debate, discuss, dialogue and deliberate, we refuse to back down to coordinated smear campaigns that have nothing to do with civil discourse and everything to do with silencing the opinions that don't conform.

and if that doesn't work, there's always another mad kane song parody (sung to the tune of "mr. ed.")
posted by skippy at 11:41 PM | 0 comments
violence not awol in iraq

violent protests and clashes by the population with the occupying forces have drastically escalated in iraq this week, culminating in 7 us troops killed today in baghdad. the washpost tells us:

seven u.s. soldiers were killed and more than 24 wounded in clashes in sadr city, a mostly shiite neighborhood in the northeastern part of the iraqi capital, an army spokesman said early monday morning.

the deadly clash came hours after supporters of moqtada sadr, a fiery, young anti-american cleric, fought sunday with a spanish-led force at a military base in the southern iraqi town of kufa and as a week of protests and violence escalated across the country.

master sgt. david a. melancon of the 1st armored division said in a statement monday that the fighting in the capital began when "the militia of moqtada sadr's army -- jaysh mahdi or mahdi army -- attempted to interfere with security in baghdad, intimidate iraqi citizens and place them in danger. specifically, the militia attempted to occupy and gain control of police stations and government buildings??

in kufa, at least 14 protesters and two soldiers, including one american, were killed and more than 100 were injured in fighting here that witnesses said involved gunfire, mortars and an ah-64 apache attack helicopter

elsewhere in iraq, news services reported that two u.s. marines from the 1st marine division were killed in anbar province, an area that extends west from the capital to the jordanian border and includes the restive city of fallujah, but few details were released. one marine was killed saturday, the other died sunday, the associated press reported.

ap also reported that a bomb exploded sunday near an iraqi police checkpoint in samarra, about 60 miles north of baghdad, killing three and wounding one.
posted by skippy at 3:01 PM | 0 comments
the ol' skippy mailbag

riffing on our question about the correct use of the term mercenary for those four guys who died in fallujah while working for money in a war zone outside of the standard military auspices, digestible news offers some alternatives. our favorite: rent-a-seal.

jj at cookies in heaven sends us the news map, but we haven't figured out what to do with it yet.

and matt at earth-info.net tells us this duet from atmo with blair and awol is hilarious.
posted by skippy at 12:55 PM | 0 comments
max not awol on instapundit's being awol about kos not being awol with integrity

max sawicky says it best.

but our leader directs more sermonizing at what he takes to be "the left," which he says is infested with rot. how about the rot infesting instapundit's blogroll? flaming racist loons, like "little green footballs" or "gut rumbles." those who wax hysterical and instigate violence against other bloggers.
posted by skippy at 11:26 AM | 0 comments

Saturday, April 03, 2004

erratum

in our rants about the right side of blotopia (and we all know who coined that phrase!) dumping on kos for his comments about the four men killed in fallujah, we did come to a conclusion about using the term "mercenary":

it is actually incorrect. every dictionary on line specifies the "foreign" aspect of the army any soldier termed a mercenary serves in (ie, a soldier hired for service in a foreign army). the best one can do in tagging these men with that term is in the loosest sense of the word, meaning "motivated solely by profit," and we can't really be sure that applies.

we regret our use of the word. until we can find a better one, we'll just call those guys who died in fallujah while working for money in a war zone outside of the standard military auspices, those who guys died in fallujah while working for money in a war zone outside of the standard military auspices.

meanwhile, trolling for hits, we attempted to go to various rightists sites who were decrying the kos, and leave comments pointing out that (a) he did not take the original post down, a popular meme on these blogs; (b) he didn't celebrate the deaths, he said he felt "nothing," which is definately not a celebration; (c) the supposed advertiser boycott of his site didn't really work; and (d) he's allowed his opinion.

but it was rather like trying to bail out the ocean. we got tired.

anyway, it doesn't look like the assault to destroy the daily kos has really worked all that well.
posted by skippy at 6:33 PM | 0 comments
say hello

to a man from skippy's home state, colorado luis (who also blogs with us on the american street).

also say hello to bluegrassroots.
posted by skippy at 4:56 PM | 0 comments
"contractors" v. "mercenaries" - final answers still awol in fallujah killings - part 1

there is quite a fracas running these days in blogtopia. now, we didn't start the fracas, but we did coin that phrase!

however the disagreement is running high, as are feelings and tossing of invective, from the very top, where nobody wants to really explain just who those 4 men killed in fallujah were, or what they were doing driving around in an suv, down to the very bottom, where the daily kos has felt repercussions for having a controversial opinion.

first, some back ground on these four unfortunate men: they were working for blackwater usa, a firm that provides "security" for a price. the price these guys were getting was $1000 a day.

the latimes:

along with blackwater usa, the elite north carolina company that employed the victims of the fallujah violence, more than 35 other security companies from around the globe employ an estimated 15,000 private security workers in iraq. dozens more companies are competing for lucrative contracts available here.

the security firms operate in a world where the military, the intelligence community and private companies merge. many of the employees once served in elite units such as the navy seals or army green berets.

their clients, activities and even the names of security firm employees are largely kept from public view. security experts estimate that dozens of the heavily armed security workers have been killed since entering iraq after the ousting of president saddam hussein nearly a year ago.

the vast majority of their work in iraq is government-funded, either through direct contracts with government agencies or indirectly as security for firms that have contracts to help rebuild iraq.

blackwater's most high-profile client also is arguably the biggest target for insurgents: l. paul bremer iii, the u.s. civilian administrator for iraq. despite and in large part because of the continuing violence in iraq, the private security industry is lucrative here. "this place is the biggest job expo going in the security world. if you can't make it here, you can't make it," said a seasoned security expert in iraq who is working with a firm under government contract.
cue mad kane: if i can make it there i'll make it anywhere, it's up to you, fal - looo, jah, fallujah!!

tamara dietrich, writing (albeit sympathetically) about this incident in the virginia daily press, comes right out and lables them:

the four blackwater usa mercenaries - or, rather, security contractors - who were ambushed, burned, dismembered and dangled over the euphrates river in fallujah, iraq, this week were supposed to be operating under the public radar. that's how it works in this burgeoning $100 billion industry in which governments hire private commandos to do the work once delegated to gi's. our government even hired blackwater bodyguards to protect its top official in iraq, paul bremer...

one perk for governments hiring private commandos, experts say, has been that they operate off the books, so to speak. if one or two or 20 happen to die in the course of an operation, the understanding is the public will find it more palatable than if they were bright-eyed towheads in army uniforms hailing from hometown, usa.

"it's a way to dodge political costs," peter singer, author of a book called "corporate warriors," said friday in the christian science monitor. plus, he said, "it's a way to avoid the public costs when things go wrong."

more than 20 of these private contractors, for instance, have been killed in colombia since 1998. and the new york times reports that three american civilians working for a northrop grumman subsidiary assigned to root out cocaine labs have been held hostage by marxist rebels for more than a year.

who knew? or, more to the point, who cared?
actually, we are of the opinion that nobody cared precisely because nobody knew.

start spreadin' the news, i'm leavin' today, i'm gonna guard a food supply...fallujah, fallujah!

bad song parody addendum: leave it to mad kane, who emailed us with thanks for the link, whereupon she insisted she thought the title of our post was going to lead into a billy joel song parody, and provided us with said satire:

we didn't start the fracas
other blogs been churning
over bodies burning
posted by skippy at 12:15 PM | 0 comments
"contractors" v. "mercenaries" - part 2

atrios points out that even faux news is having trouble with the official story that the men were "contractors" guarding a "food supply":

show: the big story with john gibson (17:21)

march 31, 2004 wednesday

...gibson: ok, let me ask you about these contractors. who is driving around in unprotected suv's in fallujah?

peters: i have to give you a painful answer on this. either the most foolish contractors in the history of mankind or frankly it may have been intelligence people doing intelligence work. i don't know. i was talking to a colonel friend of mine who is over in the gulf right now, today, about this. and he said, if they're contractors this is darwinian selection at work.

gibson: yes, but it's just kind of astonishing because saddam hussein got along apparently for months driving around in an old beat up taxi. nothing could be more obvious than an american or european suv driving around the middle of fallujah. and you have to ask, what where these people thinking?
we'd ask the same question, only we'd leave off the word "what."

addendum: the wonderful jeanne d'arc has a much more extensive analysis of the mercenary phenomenon in iraq, and jeanne refers us to kathryn cramer's work here and here on the same subject.

double addendum: unfair witness asks a question we ourselves pondered upon seeing the press about those four guys killed in fallujah: how come the rightists and the media have made them into saints, but nobody said boo about the four baptist missionaires killed in mosul earlier this year?
posted by skippy at 12:14 PM | 0 comments
"contractors" v. "mercenaries" - part 3 - a skippy rant

don't bother to think globally, react locally, that seems to be the credo of the rightist side of blogtopia (y!wctp!) these days.

markos zuniga, owner and operator of the daily kos, who himself grew up in a war zone, had some pretty unkind words for the 4 mercenary/contractors who were killed and desecrated in fallujah. he pretty well said something to the effect that he cried no tears for them, because they were there making big money, and they knew what they were getting into. which is 100% accurate. that's a big part of being a mercenary. getting money to go to dangerous places and do dangerous things.

kos felt that it was indicative of our country's rightward reactionary lack of feelings that the 4 mercenaries got all the press, while the 5 us soldiers who died in iraq the same day were hardly a blip on the national scale of newsfeed.

(full disclosure: while we can agree with his stance, we understand that the gruesome nature of what happened to the men's bodies is in itself headline news...and we can't really fault the blood-and-guts tradition of journalism, tried and true since news was first disseminated, for grabbing the world's attention. and to be honest, kos didn't fully explain the range of his feelings until the next day after his first post on the subject).

whatever. kos is allowed to say what he wants to on his blog. this is not only america, it's blogtopia, and we proudly live in the former and coined the latter.

but, of course, the rightists had to get involved. instapundit quoted a remark kos made in one of the diaries, without providing any other of kos's words or feelings as context (however, insty did provide a link to kos's explanation)(double however, however, insty catagorized kos as "gloating over the deaths," which we could not find in any of kos's writings).

but the rightists in blogtopia took it upon themselves to not only lable kos as insensitive, angry, fringe, and turning from bush hatred to "american hatred," but to also phone up some of kos's advertisers and whine that kos was not a true 'murican! boo hoo, boo hoo! and some of those advertisers pulled their ads.

as it turns out, those advertisers' current contracts were up in less than a week (so it was more like they just didn't renew). and kos tells us he got two more new advertisers in spite, or perhaps because of, the blogging controversy.

funny we didn't hear any rightist hue and cry when lgf made fun of rachel corrie, the american peace activist killed by israeli bulldozer drivers in the palestinian territories. why didn't prof. reynolds say that charles does himself no credit gloating over ms. corrie's death?

oh, what were we thinking? consistency from the right? ha ha.
posted by skippy at 12:11 PM | 0 comments

Friday, April 02, 2004

first we kill 'em, then we arrest 'em

thanks to perfectblue's comment on atrios' thread, we were sent to the memory hole, where they compared and contrasted two news items, published a year apart, which reported that one of al qaeda's top leaders was killed, and then arrested.
posted by skippy at 5:24 PM | 0 comments
say a big hello

to our good friend, mydd, who has started blogging again!

we have missed jerome and his friends, and are glad to have him back as he was one of our first supporters in blogtopia (y!wctp!).

visit mydd regularly!
posted by skippy at 12:27 PM | 0 comments
americans' trust for awol now awol

a new cbs poll shows that most americans polled now think awol is "hiding something" about what he knew before 9/11:

six in ten americans are following the hearings closely; 56 percent say the administration is cooperating with the panel. but what the administration is saying does not receives high marks: 59 percent say it is hiding something it knew before sept. 11, and 11 percent even say it is lying. only one in four think the administration is telling the entire truth.
this poll was taken earlier this week, so things are looking bad for awol.

he he he.
posted by skippy at 12:16 PM | 0 comments
plenty of plame to spread around

lest we forget the plame affair, the latest news comes that the prosecutors have expanded the investigation to find out if white house officials lied.

gee, they could just call letterman! the nytimes:

prosecutors investigating whether someone in the bush administration improperly disclosed the identity of a c.i.a. officer have expanded their inquiry to examine whether white house officials lied to investigators or mishandled classified information related to the case, lawyers involved in the case and government officials say…

the broadened scope is a potentially significant development that represents exactly what allies of the bush white house feared when attorney general john ashcroft removed himself from the case last december and turned it over to patrick j. fitzgerald, the united states attorney in chicago.
ahhh, too bad for the repubbbs!
posted by skippy at 12:02 PM | 0 comments
nathan newman not awol on jobs numbers

the jobs numbers are out today, and the good news is, over 308,000 jobs were added to the payrolls last month. cnnmoney:

u.s. payrolls grew at the fastest pace in nearly four years in march, the government said friday, in a report that soared past wall street forecasts and could play a pivotal role in fed policy and the presidential election.

though economists cautioned that one month does not a trend make, it was possibly the best economic news since the onset of the last recession in 2001, and a sign of spring for the nation's labor market, which has been mired in its longest slump since 1939.
the bad news is, unemployment went up slightly. the asspress:

at the same time, the civilian unemployment rate bumped up to 5.7 percent, the labor department reported friday..

for the first time in 44 months, the nation's factories did not shed jobs. but they weren't hiring either. march's figures show zero gains and losses for
manufacturers hammered by the economic downturn that began three years ago. the only sector losing jobs last month was information services, where companies cut about 1,000 jobs…

the jobless rate, compiled in a separate survey of households, inched up by 0.1 percentage point from 5.6 percent in february. that's because more job seekers renewed their searches last month, but were unsuccessful.

the health of the nation's economy, especially the job climate, is a major issue in this year's presidential race. the economy has lost almost 2 million jobs since bush took office in january 2001.
and nathan newman points out that the people who were still working got their hours cut by a tenth of a percent.

addendum: bill rehm in his daily kos diary points out that while that's a great number, we need 140,000 jobs each month to break even, so awol is 93,000 jobs in the for the quarter.
posted by skippy at 11:50 AM | 0 comments
oh, canada, we love your mp3's!

[ed. note: the title is funniest when sung to the tune of canada's national anthem. no, really, it is funny, really!]

thanks to jj at the daily cookie, we got to this csmonitor article which tells us that downloading music from the internet is officially legal in canada!

music lovers north of the border can swap songs online without fear of breaking the law, thanks to a canadian court decision this week.

a federal court judge ruled wednesday that downloading songs for personal use or having files available on a computer connected to the internet doesn't violate copyright laws…

but americans and europeans beware: this strictly canadian decision doesn't bring any more clarity to the murky issue of file-sharing in their parts of the world.

"canadian and american laws are very different," knopf says. "this won't have any direct effect on the united states, but it'll certainly cause a lot of concern down there."
sounds like heaven for anne murray fans!
posted by skippy at 11:39 AM | 0 comments
say hello

to digestible news.
posted by skippy at 11:29 AM | 0 comments
was truth awol for cnn over letterman's stupid kid trick?

the question on everyone's lips this week is, did cnn repeatedly err in reporting the white house's involvement in determining the veracity of a news clip david letterman showed on his late night program? or did awol actually put the screws to the news network to make dave look like an even bigger idiot than he usually does?

atrios has explained the set up here and here. but here it is, in a nutshell:

during one of awol's speeches in florida, a young 12 year old boy, who stood behind him, was seen fidgeting and yawning. letterman showed the tape of that speech under the pretext of some gag or other, making awol look as boring as he really is.

the next day cnn, on two different occasions, showed the letterman clip, and reported that the white house said the clip was edited, implying that the kid was inserted into the picture by the letterman show.

letterman, on his show that night, absolutely denied that the tape was altered in any way. according to the asspress, via usatoady:

"an out-and-out, 100% absolute lie. the kid absolutely was there and he absolutely was doing everything we pictured via the videotape...

"so when you cast your vote in november," he urged, "just remember that the white house was trying to make me look like a dope."
cnn, according to various reports, copped to making a mistake, and apologized to letterman. daryn kagen, one of the cnn anchorfolk who made the original "edited" charge, even offered to come on the late show and do a stupid human trick.

but that's not the end of it. the columbia journalism review campaign desk tells us:

[on thursday's show] letterman tells his audience, "i'm pretty sure the white house contacted cnn." he goes on to offer his own "conspiracy theory" as to why, he alleges, the white house intervened.

campaign desk sought an explanation from cnn in response to letterman's continued assertion that the white house had in fact called the network, but cnn did not return phone calls requesting comment.

while the white house did return our calls, it could not provide comment at this late hour.
and paul krugman, in the nytimes, thinks this is an all-too-familiar pattern, likening the letterman flap to the recent rumors being spread about richard clarke's private life:

on tuesday, i mentioned remarks by cnn's wolf blitzer..."what administration officials have been saying since the weekend, basically, that richard clarke from their vantage point was a disgruntled former government official...and that his own personal life, they're also suggesting there are some weird aspects in his life."

stung by my column, mr. blitzer sought to justify his words, saying that his statement was actually a question, and also saying that "i was not referring to anything charged by so-called unnamed white house officials as alleged today." silly me: i "alleged" that mr. blitzer said something because he actually said it, and described "so-called unnamed" officials as unnamed because he didn't name them.
we would not be surprised if the white house actually did get involved in something as innocuous as late night comedy. because everything else coming out of washington these days is a big joke.

update: tonight on letterman, one of the guests is that very boy who yawns at awol (we know that's a pretty wide group of people, but we specifically mean the kid in the clip dave showed).
posted by skippy at 12:04 AM | 0 comments

Thursday, April 01, 2004

say hello

to boreamerica. lonewacko was kind enough to quote our review of randi rhodes' debut : like ralph was a pinto and randi rear-ended him.

lonewacko included us in his examination of blogtopia's (yes! we coined that possessive noun!) thoughts on the debut of air america radio.
posted by skippy at 4:56 PM | 0 comments
new poll not awol from skippy

thanks to condoleeza rice's recent decision to testify before the 911 commission, our newest poll has suddenly become less relevant than democracy itself.

therefore, we have decided to set our own precedent, and discontinue this poll halfway through the week. instead, we are asking a new question, what's your opinion of air america radio?

be sure to vote early and often!
posted by skippy at 4:46 PM | 0 comments
the ol' skippy mailbag

a few of our favorite bloggers have sent us notices about their recent work:

spadehammer takes issue with adjectives used to describe the monies spent on terrorism vs. those spent on healthy family development.

mad kane has a new song parody called "fact-free bush."

and chefs at cookies in heaven showed us kinja, the weblog guide.
posted by skippy at 4:30 PM | 0 comments
randi rhodes not awol kicking nader's butt on air america

randi rhodes pretty much dissed ralph nader all the way off the air yesterday on her air america radio show. for those that missed it, here's a transcript, thanks to ckerr on daily kos.

it was pretty much like ralph was a pinto and randi rear-ended him. a beautiful explosion.

on another air america note, it seems that aa might be shooting itself in the foot by not beginning its affiliate acquisition with letting various radio stations purchase just one or two of the shows to start. the news observer in raleigh, nc, reports that station wchl in chapel hill wanted to air specific shows from aa, and keep several of its other local programs. but air america would have none of it.

"we do know that we have a fairly progressive audience," said christy jones, wchl general manager. "certainly not everyone, but of all places in this area, chapel hill would be the place where that programming would meet a receptive audience."

but air america works on an affiliate model, in which it looks for low-rated stations to take a full menu of programming, instead of syndicating individual shows to fill certain blocks of the schedule.

wchl wanted to broadcast only "the o'franken factor," with al franken, and "the majority report," featuring comedian janeane garofalo.

"we obviously can't just disregard all of our local programming," jones said.

until friday, wchl thought it could come to an arrangement with air america, but the deal fell through.
this is strange, because wmnn in minnesota is airing just "the o'franken factor," according to the star tribune.

too bad, chapel hill! you're missing out on some great radio!
posted by skippy at 12:17 PM | 0 comments
the times they are a' pollin'

the latimes' new poll shows that while most people asked think richard clarke's accusations against awol were timed for political motivations, the majority also believe those same accusations.

nearly three-fifths of those surveyed echoed the contention by clarke that bush placed a higher priority on invading iraq than combating terrorism. and a smaller majority agreed with the charge by the onetime white house counterterrorism chief that bush did not focus enough on the terrorist threat before the sept. 11 attacks.

yet nearly three-fifths agreed that clarke's new book on the subject was "politically motivated" and intended to influence the presidential election. and despite the attention clarke's charges have received, almost three-fifths of americans said bush's anti-terrorism and defense policies had made the nation more secure.
beyond that, however, the poll found that kerry leads awol 49% to 46%. and even when ralph nader is factored in, the numbers for both principles shrink, but kerry still leads by three points.

so please do not believe the screeching heads who are touting awol's "recent surge in the polls" as if it were the second coming of mel gibson.
posted by skippy at 12:09 PM | 0 comments
majority report starring janeane garafalo and sam seder not awol from blogtopia (yes! we coined that phrase!)

[ed. note: can some of those running gags please start running away now?]

topping off a great first show, with, among others, the one and only atrios as a guest, janeane and sam begin their foray into media madness with a companion blog to go with their show majority report on air america radio .
posted by skippy at 12:02 AM | 0 comments